Maintenance of Oral Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: Verb Tense Morphology Training

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 105-118

  Boser, Katharina I ^a   Weinrich, Michael ^a   Mccall, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aphasia therapy; Computer learning tools; Maintenance; Verb tense morphology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APHASIA; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH THERAPY;

AGED; APHASIA, BROCA; HUMANS; MALE; RECURRENCE; RETREATMENT; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH THERAPY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033813010     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154596830001400203     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force on treatment outcomes/cost effectiveness. In: National report cards numbers 1–8: Adults in health care settings. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force, 1996 (National treatment outcome data collection project).
2. Aten J Wertz RT Simpson M Vogel D Graner D. A long-term follow-up of aphasic patients after intensive treatment. In: Brookshire RH,(ed. ). Clinical aphasiology. Vol. 20. Minneapolis: BRK Publishers, 1990: 299–306.
3. Collins MJ Wertz RT. Coping with success: The maintenance of therapeutic effects in aphasia. In: Brookshire RH,(ed. ). Clinical aphasiology. Vol. 13. Minneapolis: BRK Publishers, 1983: 156–163.
4. Holland AL. The usefulness of treatment for aphasia: A serendipitous study. In: Brookshire RH,(ed. ). Clinical aphasiology. Vol. 10. Minneapolis: BRK Publishers, 1980b: 240–247.
5. Porch B. The Porch index of communicative ability. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1967.
6. Holland AL. Communicative abilities in daily living (CADL). Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980a.
7. Aten J Caligiuri M Holland AL. The efficacy of functional communication therapy for chronic aphasic patients. J Speech Hearing Disorders 1982; 47: 93–96.
8. Kearns K Salmon J. An experimental analysis of auxiliary and copula verb generalization in aphasia. J Speech Hearing Disorders 1984; 49: 152–163.
9. Thompson C Kearns K. An experimental analysis of naming behavior in a patient with anomia. In: Brookshire RH,(ed. ). Clinical aphasiology. Minneapolis: BRK Publishers, 1981: 35–45.
10. Bock K Levelt W. Language production: Grammatical encoding. In: Gernsbacher M,(ed. ). Handbook of psycholinguistics. London: Academic Press, 1994: 945–984.
11. Steele RD Weinrich M Wertz RT Kleczewska MK Carlson GA. Computer-based visual communication in aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1989; 27: 409–426.
12. Weinrich M Steele RD Carlson GS, et al. Processing of visual syntax in a globally aphasic patient. Brain Language 1989; 36: 391–405.
13. Shelton JR Weinrich M McCall D Cox DM. Differentiating globally aphasic patients: Data from in-depth language assessments and production training using C-VIC. Aphasiology 1996; 10: 319–342.
14. Byng S Coltheart M. Aphasia therapy and research: Methodological requirements and illustrative results. In: Hjelmquist E., NilssonLG,(eds. ). Communication and handicap: Aspects of psychological compensation and technical aids. North-Holland: Elsevier, 1986.
15. Mitchum CC Berndt RS. Aphasia rehabilitation: An approach to diagnosis and treatment of disorders of language production. In: Eisenberg MG,(ed. ). Advances in clinical rehabilitation. New York: Springer, 1988.
16. Mitchum CC Haendiges AN Berndt RS. Treatment of thematic mapping in sentence comprehension: Implications for normal processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1994; 12: 503–547.
17. Howard D Patterson K. Models for therapy. In: Seron X., DelocheG,(ed. ). Cognitive approaches in rehabilitation. Hillsdale: LEA, 1989: 39–63.
18. Thompson C Shapiro L Tait M Jacobs B Schneider S. Training wh-question production in agrammatic aphasia: Analysis of argument and adjunct movement. Brain Language 1996; 52: 175–228.
19. Weinrich M Shelton J Cox DM McCall D. Remediating production of tense morphology improves verb retrieval in chronic aphasia. Brain Language 1997; 58: 23–45.
20. Baddeley AD. Domains of recollection. Psychol Rev 1982; 89: 708–729.
21. Shelton J Weinrich M. Further evidence of a dissociation between output phonological and orthographic lexicons: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1997; 14: 105–129.
22. Weinrich M Boser K McCall D. Representation of linguistic rules in the brain: Evidence from training an aphasic patient to produce past tense verb morphology. Brain Language. Submitted.
23. Kay J Lesser R Coltheart M. Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA). London: LEA, 1992.
24. Goodglass H Kaplan D. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1983.
25. Saffran EM Schwartz MF Linebarger M Martin N Bochetto P. The Philadelphia Sentence Comprehension Battery. Unpublished test battery, 1988.
26. Weinrich M McCall D Weber C Thomas K Thornburg L. Training on an iconic communication system for severe aphasia can improve natural language production. Aphasiology 1995a; 9: 343–364.
27. Weinrich M McCall D Shoosmith L Thomas K Katzenberger K Weber C. Locative prepositional phrases in severe aphasia. Brain Language 1993; 45: 21–45.
28. Weinrich M McCall D Weber C. Thematic role assignment in two severely aphasic patients: Associations and dissociations. Brain Language 1995b; 48: 221–237.
29. Mitchum CC Haendiges A Berndt RS. Model-guided treatment to improve written sentence production: A case study. Aphasiology 1993; 7: 71–109.
30. McGeoch JA McDonald WT. Meaningful relation and retroactive inhibition. Am J Psychol 1981; 43: 579–588.
31. Kolk H Van Grunsven M. Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychol 1985; 2(4): 347–384.
32. Kolk H Hofstede B. The effects of task variation on the production of grammatical morphology in Broca's aphasia: A multiple case study. Brain Language 1994; 46: 278–328.
33. Boser K Weinrich M. Functional categories in agrammatic production: Evidence for access to tense projections. Brain Language 1998; 65: 207–210.
34. Kearns KP. Methodological issues in treatment research: A single subject perspective. In: CooperJ,(ed. ). Aphasia treatment: Current approaches and research opportunities. Bethesda: NIH Publication No. 93–3424, 1992: 7–16 (Proceedings of a workshop, NIDCD Monograph; vol 2.).