Effect of dialysate-side mass transfer resistance on small solute removal in hemodialysis

Blood Purification

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 260-263

  Clark, William R ^a,b,d   Shinaberger, James H ^c  

^a Renal Division   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d WISHARD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DIALYSATE; DIALYSIS; DIFFUSION; FLOW RATE; HEMODIALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UREMIA;

EID: 0033808225     PISSN: 02535068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000014446     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Vanholder R, De Smet R: Pathophysiologic effects of uremic retention solutes. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:1815-1823.
2. Clark WR, Henderson LW: Renal vs. continuous vs. intermittent therapies for removal of uremic toxins. Kideny Int, in press.
3. Collins AJ, Ma JZ, Umen A, Keshaviah P: Urea index and other predictors of long-term outcome in hemodialysis patient survival. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;23:272-282.
4. Sargent J, Gotch F: Principles and biophysics of dialysis; in Jacobs C, Kjellstrand C, Koch K, Winchester J (eds): Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, ed 4. Dortdrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. pp 34-102.
5. Clark WR, Hamburger RJ, Lysaghi MJ: Effect of membrane composition and structure on solute removal and biocompatibility in hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1999;56:2005-2015.
6. Zhang J, Parker D, Leypoldt JK: Flow distributions in hollow fiber hemodialyzers using magnetic resonance fourier velocitv imaging. ASAIO J 1995;41:M678-M682.
7. Ronco C, Scabardi M, Goldoni M, Brendolan A, Crepaldi C, LaGreca G: Impact of spacing filaments external to hollow fibers on dialysate flow distribution and dialyzer performance. Int J Artif Organs 1997;20:261-266.
8. Hoenich N, Woffindin C, Ronco C: Haemodialysers and associated devices: in Jacobs C, Kjellstrand C, Koch K, Winchester J (eds): Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, ed 4. Dortdrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, p 188-230.
9. Leypoldt JK, Cheung A, Agodoa L, Daugirdas J, Greene T, Keshaviah P: Hemodialyzer mass transfer-area coefficients for urea increase at high dialysate flow rates. Kidney Int 1997;51: 2013-2017.
10. Michaels AS: Operating parameters and performance criteria for hemodialyzers and other membrane-separation devices. Trans ASAIO 1966;12:387-392.
11. Clark WR, Shinaberger JH: Clinical evaluation of a new high-efficiency hemodialyzer: Polysynthane (PSN™). ASAIO J 2000;46:288-292.
12. Jindall K, McDougall J, Woods B, Nowakowski L, Goldstein M: A study of the basic principles determining the performance of several high-flux dialyzers. Am J Kidney Dis 1989;14: 507-511.
13. Sigdell J, Tersteegen B: Clearance of a dialyzer under varying operating conditions. Artif Organs 1986;10:219-225.
14. Leypoldt JK, Cheung A: Effect of low dialysate flow rates on hemodialyzer mass transfer area coefficients for urea and creatinine. Home HD Int 1999;3:51-54.
15. Ward R, Ouseph R: Increasing dialysate flow rate increases the urea mass transfer coefficient: membrane area product during clinical dialysis (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10: 199A.
16. Choong L, Leypoldt JK, Cheung A: Dialyzer mass transfer-area coefficients during clinical hemodialysis are dependent on both blood flow and dialysate flow rates (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:189A.
17. Hauk M, Kuhlmann M, Riegel W, Kohler H: In vivo effects of dialysate flow rate on Kt/V in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35:105-111.