Magnetic resonance angiography of aorto-iliac disease

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 180, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 6-12

  Swan, J Shannon ^a   Kennell, Todd W ^a   Acher, Charles W ^b   Heisey, Dennis M ^b   Grist, Thomas M ^a,b   Korosec, Frank R ^a,b   Hagenauer, Mary E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STANDARD; SURGEON; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; AORTIC DISEASES; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOLOGY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; SURGERY;

EID: 0033807287     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00412-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Owen R.S., Baum R.S., Carpenter J.P., et al. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography . Radiology. 187:1993;627-635.
2. Yucel E.K., Kaufman J.A., Geller S.C., Waltman A.C. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography . Radiology. 187:1993;637-641.
3. Baum R.A., Rutter C.M., Sunshine J.H., et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. JAMA. 274:1995;875-880.
4. Prince M.R., Yucel E.K., Kaufman J.A., et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three dimensional MR arteriography. J MRI. 3:1993;877-881.
5. Hany T.F., Debatin J.F., Leung D.A., Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aorto-iliac and renal arteries comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography . Radiology. 204:1997;357-362.
6. Swan J.S., Fryback D.G., Lawrence W.L., et al. MR and conventional angiography work in progress toward assessing utility in radiology . Acad Radiol. 4:1997;475-482.
7. Swan J.S., Fryback D.G., Lawrence W.F., et al. A time trade-off method for cost-effectiveness models applied to radiology. Med Decis Making. 20:2000;79-88.
8. Fryback D.G., Thornbury J.R. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. 11:1991;88-94.
9. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 143:1982;29-36.
10. Efron B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. 1982;Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
11. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psycholog Meas. 20:1960;37-46.
12. Cohen J. Weighted Kappa nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit . Psycholog Bull. 70:1968;213-220.
13. Fleiss J.L., Cohen J., Everett B.S. Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psycholog Bull. 72:1969;323-327.
14. Korosec F.R., Frayne R., Grist T.M., Mistretta C.A. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. MRM. 36:1996;345-351.
15. Swan J.S., Grist T.M., Frayne R., et al. Time-Resolved MR Angiography of the Peripheral Vasculature. 1997;131 Fifth ISMRM, Vancouver, BC. Book of abstracts.
16. Ho K.Y.J.A.M., Leiner T., de Haan M.W., et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography . Radiology. 206:1998;683-692.
17. Hoch J.R., Kennell T.W., Hollister M.S., et al. Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiograph-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Surg. 178:1999;166-172.
18. Flamm C.R. Technology assessment of magnetic resonance angiography why pretty pictures are not enough. An overview . Invest Radiol. 33:1998;547-552.
19. Quinn S.F., Sheley R.C., Semonsen K.G., et al. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography . Radiology. 206:1998;693-701.
20. Snidow J.J., Johnson M.S., Harris V.J., et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aorto-iliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath-hold. Radiology. 198:1996;725-732.
21. HCFA Coverage Issues Manual. August 1999:section 50-14. URL: http://www.hcfa.gov/pubforms/06_cim/ci50.htm.114.
22. Adam G., Bücker A., Glowinski A. Interventional magnetic resonance angiography. Semin Intervent Radiol. 16:1999;31.
23. Omary R.A., Frayne R., Unal O., et al. MR angioplasty of renal artery stenosis in a pig model a feasibility study . J VIR. 11:2000.