QUOROM and the search for an updated 'clinical method' in the era of evidence-based medicine

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 923-925

  Casali, P G ^a,b   Licitra, L ^a,b   Bruzzi, P ^a,c  

^a EUROPEAN SCHOOL OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033802502     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008307108460     Document Type: Editorial

References (18)

1. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement
2. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials. The CONSORT statement
3. Systems of protocol review, quality assurance, and data audit
4. Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions
5. The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved?
6. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P-value fallacy
7. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor
8. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis
9. Medical practice guidelines: Current activities and future directions
10. Grey zones of clinical practice: Some limits to evidence-based medicine
11. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine
12. Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't
13. Decision analysis and clinical judgment
14. Decision analysis
15. Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 3 - Estimating probabilities and utilities
16. Quality of life assessment and clinical decision-making
17. START: A European state-of-the-art on-line instrument for clinical oncologists