Evaluating the administration of an office-based health survey in a primary care practice

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1002-1012

  Rothemich, Stephen F ^a   Woolf, Steven H ^a   Johnson, Robert E ^b   Marsland, David W ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Health services research; Health status; Health surveys; Outcomes assessment (health care); Primary health care; Questionnaires

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0033802275     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00195-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kane R.L. Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. 1997;Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD.
2. Chassin M.R. Quality of health care. Part 3. improving the quality of care N Engl J Med. 335:1996;1060-1063.
3. Blumenthal D. Quality of health care. Part 4. the origins of the quality-of-care debate N Engl J Med. 335:1996;1146-1149.
4. Shiely J., Bayliss M.S., Keller S.D.et al. SF-36 Health Survey Annotated Bibliography. First Edition (1988-1995):1996;Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston.
5. Tsai C, Bayliss M, Ware J. SF-36 Health Survey Annotated Bibliography: 1996 Supplement. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1997.
6. Fryback D.G., Dasbach E.J., Klein R., Klein B.E., Dorn N., Peterson K., Martin P.A. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. initial catalog of health-state quality factors Med Decis Making. 13:1993;89-102.
7. Iezzoni L.I. Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann Intern Med. 127:1997;666-674.
8. Greenfield S. Measuring the quality of office practice. Goldfield N., Nash D.B. Providing Quality Care. 2nd ed:1995;Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives, Ann Arbor, MI.
9. McHorney C.A., Kosinski M., Ware J.E. Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview. results from a national survey Med Care. 32:1994;551-567.
10. Aday L.A. Designing and Conducting Health Surveys. A Comprehensive Guide 2nd ed:1996;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
11. Nerenz D.R., Repasky D.P., Whitehouse F.W., Kahkonen D.M. Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus. Med Care. 30:1992;MS112-MS124.
12. Chen A.L., Broadhead W.E., Doe E.A., Broyles W.K. Patient acceptance of two health status measures. the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form General Health Survey and the Duke Health Profile Fam Med. 25:1993;536-539.
13. Tarlov A.R., Ware J.E. Jr., Greenfield S., Nelson E.C., Perrin E., Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 262:1989;925-930.
14. Nelson E.C., Landgraf J.M., Hays R.D., Wasson J.H., Kirk J.W. The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians' offices? Med Care. 28:1990;1111-1126.
15. Ware J.E. Jr., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 30:1992;473-483.
16. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E. Jr., Raczek A.E. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs Med Care. 31:1993;247-263.
17. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E. Jr., Lu J.F., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups Med Care. 32:1994;40-66.
18. Ware J.E., Snow K.K., Kosinski M.et al. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide:1993;Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston.
19. Lavin M.R. Understanding the Census. A Guide for Marketers, Planners, Grant Writers and Other Data Users:1996;Epoch Books, New York.
20. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1993. Vital Health Stat 1994;10.
21. Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. A User's Manual:1994;The Health Institute, Boston, MA.
22. Woolf S., Rothemich S., Johnson J., Marsland D. Is cigarette smoking associated with impaired physical and mental functional status? Am J Prev Med. 17:1999;134-137.
23. Woolf S., Rothemich S., Johnson J., Marsland D. The functional status of inner-city primary care patients. diminished function in a family practice population and its potential determinants J Fam Prac. 47:1998;312-315.
24. Hayes V., Morris J., Wolfe C., Morgan M. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire. is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Ageing. 24:1995;120-125.
25. Brazier J.E., Harper R., Jones N.M., O'Cathain A., Thomas K.J., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. new outcome measure for primary care BMJ. 305:1992;160-164.
26. Nelson E.C., Batalden P.B., Plume S.K., Mihevc N.T., Swartz W.G. Report cards or instrument panels. who needs what? Jt Comm J Qual Improve. 21:1995;155-166.
27. Batalden P.B., Nelson E.C., Roberts J.S. Linking outcomes measurements to continual improvement. the serial "V" way of thinking about improving clinical care Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 20:1994;167-180.
28. White K.L., Williams T.F.K., Greenberg B.G. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 265:1961;885-892.
29. Hunskaar S., Seim A., Freeman T. The journey of incontinent women from community to university clinic; implications for selection bias, gatekeeper function, and primary care. Fam Pract. 13:1996;363-368.
30. Bowling A., Bond M., Jenkinson C., Lamping D.L. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire. which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey J Public Health Med. 21:1999;255-270.
31. Rolnick S.J., Gross C.R., Garrard J., Gibson R.W. A comparison of response rate, data quality, and cost in the collection of data on sexual history and personal behaviors. Mail survey approaches and in-person interview. Am J Epidemiol. 129:1989;1052-1061.
32. O'Toole B.I., Battistutta D., Long A., Crouch K. A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods. mail, telephone and personal home interview Am J Epidemiol. 124:1986;317-328.
33. Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health. 69:1979;238-245.
34. Fowler F.J. Jr., Gallagher P.M., Nederend S. Comparing telephone and mail responses to the CAHPS survey instrument. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study. Med Care. 37:1999;MS41-MS49.
35. Perkins J.J., Sanson-Fisher R.W. An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 51:1998;969-973.
36. Brambilla D.J., McKinlay S.M. A comparison of responses to mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews in a mixed mode health survey. Am J Epidemiol. 126:1987;962-971.
37. Camp R.C., Tweet A.G. Benchmarking applied to health care. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 20:1994;229-238.
38. Franks P., Nutting P.A., Clancy C.M. Health care reform, primary care, and the need for research. JAMA. 270:1993;1449-1453.
39. Lanier D., Clancy C. Primary care research. current challenges, future needs J Fam Pract. 44:1997;434-438.
40. Cleary P.D., Edgman-Levitan S. Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA. 278:1997;1608-1612.