Towards a minimum dataset in urology

BJU International

Volumn 86, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 765-772

  Thomas, K ^a   Emberton, M ^a,b,c   Mundy, A R ^b  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c CEU ^*

Author keywords

Comparative audit; Data collection; Dataset; Medical records; Optical image; Recognition; Registry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DATA BASE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; UROLOGY;

DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UROLOGY;

EID: 0033756655     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2000.00912.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Murray GD, Hayes C, Fowler S, Dunn DC. Presentation of comparative audit data. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 329-32
2. Ballaro A. Oliver S, Emberton M. Do we do what they say we do? coding errors in urology. BJU Int 2000; 85: 389-91
3. Ellis BW, Michie HR, Esufali ST, Pyper RJD, Dudley HAF. Development of a micro computer-based system for surgical audit and patient administration: a review. J Roy Soc Med 1987; 80: 157-61
4. Reeves B, Emberton M. Tackling the quality agenda in surgery: taking comparative audit into the next century. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl 1999; 81: 138-43
5. BAUS, Section of Oncology. November 1999
6. Keogh BE, Kinsman R. The Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. National Adult Cardiac Database Report, 1998
7. Hammond M, Stassen L. Do you CARE? A national register for cleft lip and palate patients. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52: 12-7
8. Burack JH, Impellizzeri P, Homel P, Cunningham JN. Public reporting of surgical mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1195-200