Do we do what they say we do? Coding errors in urology

BJU International

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 389-391

  Ballaro, A ^a   Oliver, S ^a   Emberton, M ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coding errors; Data recording; Performance tables

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CODING; DATA ANALYSIS; ERROR; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UROLOGY;

FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; RESEARCH DESIGN; UROLOGY;

EID: 0034049504     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2000.00471.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. 1 Gibson N, Bridgman SA. A novel method for the assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic codes in general surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80: 293-6
2. 2 Scally G, Donaldson LJ. Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. Br Med J 1998; 317: 61-5
3. 3 Mant J, Mant F, Winner S. How good is routine information? Validation of coding for acute stroke in Oxford hospitals. Health Trends 1997; 29: 96-9
4. 4 World Health Organisation. International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO, 1992
5. 5 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures. Fourth Revision, consolidated version. London: HMSO, 1990