Effects of grinding, polishing, and overglazing on the flexure strength of a high-leucite feldspathic porcelain

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 30-37

  Williamson, Russell T ^a   Kovarik, Robert F ^a   Mitchell, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; FELDSPAR; LEUCITE; OPTEC; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE; WATER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 0029692286     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McLean JW. Ceramics in clinical dentistry. Br Dent J 1988;164:187-194.
2. Messer PF, Piddock V, Lloyd CH. The strength of dental ceramics. J Dent 1991;19:51-55.
3. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-865.
4. Southan DE. Factors affecting the translucency of dental porcelain. Quintessence Int 1987;18:197-202.
5. Katz S [inventor]. High strength feldspathic dental porcelain containing crystalline leucite. US Patent No. 4,798,536. 17 Jan 1989.
6. Piche PW, O'Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. Leucite content of selected dental porcelains. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28: 603-609.
7. Shareef MY, Van Noort R, Messer PF, Piddock V. The effect of microstructural features on the biaxial flexural strength of leucite reinforced glass-ceramics. J Mater Sci: Mater Medicine 1994;5:113-118.
8. Mackert JR Jr, Evans AL. Effect of cooling rate on leucite volume fraction in dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1991;70:137-139.
9. Southan DE. Effect of surface injury on chemically strengthened dental porcelain. Quintessence Int 1987;18:575-580.
10. Sano Y, Fujisawa M, Shinohara K, Uetani T, Tadona H, Horiguchi H, et al. The influence of surface properties on the bending strength of Optec porcelain. J Gifu Dent Soc 1989;16:577-581.
11. Sherrill CA, O'Brien WJ. Transverse strength of aluminous and feldspathic porcelain. J Dent Res 1974;53:683-690.
12. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Thompson WO. The effect of glaze on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 1992;8: 203-207.
13. Giordano RA II, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of feldspathic porcelain treated with ion exchange, overglaze, and polishing. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:468-472.
14. Rosenstiel SF, Baiker MA, Johnston WM. A comparison of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:524-529.
15. Jones DW. The strength and strengthening mechanisms of dental ceramics. In: McLean JW (ed). Dental Ceramics-Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1983:83-141.
16. Southan DE. Dental porcelain. In: von Fraunhofer JA (ed). Scientific Aspects of Dental Materials. London: Butterworths, 1975:277-305.
17. Wiederhorn SM. A chemical interpretation of static fatigue. J Am Ceram Soc 1972;55:81-85.
18. Ritter RE Jr. Engineering design and fatigue failure of brittle materials. In: Bradt RC, Evans AG, Hasselman DPH, Lange FA (eds). Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, vol. 4. New York: Plentun, 1974:667-686.
19. Southan DE, Jorgensen KD. The endurance limit of dental porcelain. Aust Dent J 1974;19:7-11.
20. Jones DW, Sutow EJ. Stress corrosion failure of dental porcelain. Brit Ceram T 1987;86:40-43.
21. Morena R, Beaudreau CM, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Fairhurst CW. Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res 1986;65:993-997.
22. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Twiggs SW. Dynamic fatigue of feldspathic porcelain. Dent Mater 1993;9:269-273.
23. Myers ML, Ergle JW, Fairhurst CW, Ringle RD. Fatigue characteristics of a high-strength porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:253-257.
24. American Dental Association. Dental Ceramic. American National Standards/American Dental Association Specification No. 69. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1991.
25. Baratta FI. Requirements of flexure testing of brittle materials. In: Feiman SW, Hudson CW (eds). Methods for Assessing the Structural Reliability of Brittle Materials; ASTM STP 844. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials, 1984:194-222.
26. Shelly DK, Rosenfeld AR, Duckworth WH, Held PR. A biaxial-flexure test for evaluating ceramic strengths. J Am Ceram Soc 1983;66:36-42.
27. Wagner CW, O'Brien WJ, Mora CP. Fracture-surface analysis of a glaze-strengthened magnesia core material. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:475-478.
28. Cook RF, Lawn BR, Dabbs TP, Chantikul P. Effect of machining damage on the strength of a glass-ceramic. J Am Ceram Soc/Communications 1981;69:C121-C122.
29. Seghi RR, Daher T, Caputo A. Relative flexural strength of dental restorative ceramics. Dent Mater 1990;6:181-184.
30. White SN, Seghi RR. The effect of ion strengthening time/temperature kinetics on the flexural strength of feldspathic porcelains. Dent Mater 1992;8:320-323.
31. Anusavice KJ, DeHoff PH, Hoijatie B, Cray A. Influence of tempering and contraction mismatch on crack development in ceramic surfaces. J Dent Res 1989;70:131-136.
32. Jones DW, Wilson HJ. Porosity in dental ceramics. Brit Dent J 1975;138:16-21.
33. Oilo G. Flexural strength and internal defects of some dental porcelains. Acta Odontol Scand 1988;46:313-322.
34. Mackert JR Jr, Reuggeberg FA, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Thompson WO. Isothermal anneal effect on microcrack density around leucite particles in dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1994;73:1221-1227.
35. Corbitt GV, Morena R, Fairhurst CW. Fracture stress of a commercial dental porcelain and its components [abstract 1089]. J Dent Res 1985;64(special issue):296.
36. Anusavice KJ, Lee RB. Effect of firing temperature and water exposure on crack propagation in unglazed porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1075-1081.