Entangling dipole-dipole interactions for quantum logic with neutral atoms

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 062309-062301

  Brennen, Gavin K ^a   Deutsch, Ivan H ^a   Jessen, Poul S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; ELECTRON SCATTERING; ERRORS; LOGIC GATES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHOTONS; PROBABILITY; SPONTANEOUS EMISSION;

DIPOLE-DIPOLE INTERACTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MULTIPARTICLE ENTANGLEMENT; PHOTON SCATTERING; QUANTUM LOGIC GATE;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0033721921     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. J. J. Bollinger et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996). S. F. Huelga et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3865 (1997) ; A. M. Childs, J. Preskill, and J. Renes, e-print quant-ph/9904021 v2.
2. J. J. Bollinger et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996). S. F. Huelga et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3865 (1997) ; A. M. Childs, J. Preskill, and J. Renes, e-print quant-ph/9904021 v2.
3. J. J. Bollinger et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996). S. F. Huelga et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3865 (1997) ; A. M. Childs, J. Preskill, and J. Renes, e-print quant-ph/9904021 v2.
4. S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
5. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2274 (1999).
6. Introduction to Quantum Computation and Information, edited by H.-K. Lo, S. Popescu, and T. Spiller (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
7. J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
8. T. Pellizzari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3788 (1995). P. Domokos et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, 3554 (1995).
9. T. Pellizzari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3788 (1995). P. Domokos et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, 3554 (1995).
10. C. Monroe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995); Q. A. Turchette et al., ibid. 81, 3631 (1998).
11. C. Monroe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995); Q. A. Turchette et al., ibid. 81, 3631 (1998).
12. Q. A. Turchette et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997).
13. Q. A. Turchette et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997).
14. N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997). D. G. Cory et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1634 (1997).
15. N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997). D. G. Cory et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1634 (1997).
16. S. L. Braunstein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1054 (1999).
17. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
18. J. E. Mooij et al., Science 285, 1036 (1999).
19. B. E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998); R. Vrijen et al., e-print quant-ph/9905096.
20. B. E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998); R. Vrijen et al., e-print quant-ph/9905096.
21. G. K. Brennen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1060 (1999).
22. D. Jaksch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1975 (1999).
23. Q. A. Turchette et al., Laser Phys. 8, 713 (1998).
24. A. Hemmerich, Phys. Rev. A 60, 943 (1999).
25. P. S. Jessen and I. H. Deutsch, Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 37, 95 (1996).
26. Micromagnetic traps are most promising for obtaining the tight confinement of interest here. See, for example, J. Reichel, W. Hänsel, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3398 (1999), and references therein.
27. I. H. Deutsch, G. K. Brennan, and P. S. Jessen, Fortschr. Phys., special issue on experimental proposals for quantum computation (to be published).
28. For a review see J. Weiner et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1 (1999), and references therein.
29. C. J. Williams and P. S. Julienne, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 2634 (1994); P. D. Lett, P. S. Julienne, and W. D. Phillips, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 423 (1996).
30. C. J. Williams and P. S. Julienne, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 2634 (1994); P. D. Lett, P. S. Julienne, and W. D. Phillips, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 423 (1996).
31. See, for example, C. Cohen Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992), pp. 585-589.
32. J. Guo and J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3128 (1995); E. V. Goldstein, P. Pax, and P. Meystre, ibid. 53, 2604 (1996).
33. J. Guo and J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3128 (1995); E. V. Goldstein, P. Pax, and P. Meystre, ibid. 53, 2604 (1996).
34. P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 698 (1988).
35. R. H. Lemberg, Phys. Rev. A 2, 883 (1970); M. Trippenbach, B. Gao, J. Cooper, and K. Burnett, ibid. 45, 6555 (1992).
36. R. H. Lemberg, Phys. Rev. A 2, 883 (1970); M. Trippenbach, B. Gao, J. Cooper, and K. Burnett, ibid. 45, 6555 (1992).
37. E. U. Condon and G. H. Shortley, The Theory of Atomic Spectra (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1935).
38. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloe, Quantum Mechanics (Hermann, Paris, France, 1977), Vol. 1.
39. M. Moshinsky, Nucl. Phys. 13, 104 (1959).
40. See EPAPS Document No. E-PLRAAN-61-077006 for the calculation of the tensor coupling between two particles occupying a common spherical well. Dipole-dipole interaction matrix elements for up to two quanta shared between two atoms are tabulated therein. This document may be retrieved via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html) or from ftp.aip.org in the directory /epaps/. See the EPAPS homepage for more information.
41. T. A. Brody, G. Jacob, and M. Moshinsky, Nucl. Phys. 17, 16 (1960).
42. A. Barenko et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995).
43. S. E. Hamann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4149 (1998); H. Perrin et al., Europhys. Lett. 42, 395 (1998); A. J. Kerman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 438 (2000).
44. S. E. Hamann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4149 (1998); H. Perrin et al., Europhys. Lett. 42, 395 (1998); A. J. Kerman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 438 (2000).
45. S. E. Hamann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4149 (1998); H. Perrin et al., Europhys. Lett. 42, 395 (1998); A. J. Kerman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 438 (2000).
46. I. H. Deutsch and P. S. Jessen, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1972 (1998); M. Morinaga et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4037 (1999).
47. I. H. Deutsch and P. S. Jessen, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1972 (1998); M. Morinaga et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4037 (1999).
48. For a review of experiments that perform quantum coherent manipulations of trapped ions, see D. J. Wineland et al., J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 103, 259 (1998).
49. M. D. Lukin and P. R. Hemmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2818 (2000).
50. J. Preskill, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 385 (1998).
51. C. Zalka, e-print quant-ph/9612028.
52. S. Marksteiner et al., Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. B60, 145 (1995).
53. M. Olshanii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 938 (1998); E. Tiesinga, C. J. Williams, F. H. Mies, and P. S. Julienne (unpublished).
54. M. Olshanii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 938 (1998); E. Tiesinga, C. J. Williams, F. H. Mies, and P. S. Julienne (unpublished).
55. F. Mies, E. Tiesinga, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022721 (2000).
56. R. Wynar et al., Science 287, 1016 (2000).