Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support systems

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 195-206

  George, Joey F ^a   Duffy, Kevin ^b   Ahuja, Manju ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; DECISION MAKING; HEURISTIC METHODS;

AUTOMATED DECISION SUPPORT;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033687364     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00074-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alpert M., Raiffa H. A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. 1982;294-305 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
2. Alter S.L. Decision Support Systems. 1980;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Block R.A., Harper D.R. Overconfidence in estimation: testing the anchoring-and-adjustment hypothesis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes. 49:1991;188-207.
4. Connolly T., Dean D. Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks. Manage. Sci. 43(7):1997;1029-1045.
5. Fischhoff B. Debiasing. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. 1982;422-444 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
6. Hogarth R.M. Judgement and Choice, 2/e. 1987;Wiley, Chichester.
7. Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Experts, amateurs, and real estate: an anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes. 39:1987;84-97.
8. Ritov I. Anchoring in simulated competitive market negotiation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes. 67(1):1996;16-25.
9. Roy M.C., Lerch F.J. Overcoming ineffective mental representations in base-rate problems. Inf. Syst. Res. 7(2):1996;233-247.
10. Sharp G.L., Cutler B.L., Penrod S.D. Performance feedback improves the resolution of confidence judgments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes. 42:1988;271-283.
11. Silver M. Decision support systems: directed and nondirected change. Inf. Syst. Res. 1(1):1990;47-70.
12. Sprague R.H. A framework for the development of decision support systems. MIS Q. 4(4):1980.
13. Todd P., Benbasat I. An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids on decision-making strategies. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(2):1991;87-115.
14. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 185:1974;1124-1131.
15. Whyte G., Sebenius J. The effect of multiple anchors on anchoring in individual and group judgement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes. 69(1):1997;75-85.