Supreme court examines impact of errors in detecting bias during jury selection

Violence and Victims

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 209-224

  Hafemeister, T L ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COURT; ERROR;

EID: 0033677438     PISSN: 08866708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.15.2.209     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Explaining the public wariness of juries
2. Batson meets the First Amendment: Prohibiting peremptory challenges that violate a prospective juror's speech and association rights
3. Eliminating a safe haven for discrimination: Why New York must ban peremptory challenges from jury selection
4. Why the peremptory challenge should be abolished
5. The peremptory challenge as a manipulative device in criminal trials: Traditional use or abuse
6. Peremptory challenges as a shield for the pariah
7. A challenge for cause against peremptory challenges in criminal proceedings
8. Juror judgments about liability and damages: Sources of variability and ways to increase consistency
9. 'And then there were none': The fate of peremptory challenges in New York
10. The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes
11. Peremptory challenges should be abolished: A trial judge's perspective
12. Felony voir dire: An exploratory study of its content and effect
13. The effects of pretrial publicity on jurors
14. On the effectiveness of voir dire in criminal cases with prejudicial pretrial publicity: An empirical study
15. Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias
16. What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process
17. Beyond gender: Peremptory challenges and the roles of the jury
18. Consequences of stereotype suppression: Stereotypes on AND not on the rebound
19. The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity
20. Attitudes toward tort reform, scientific jury selection, and juror bias: Verdict inclination in criminal and civil trials
21. Attorneys' lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies
22. The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments
23. The smaller the jury, the greater the unpredictability
24. What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions?
25. The why and how of using social science research in jury selection
26. Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense
27. Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity, and awareness of bias in simulated jurors
28. What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures
29. Ironic processes of mental control
30. And then there were none: The diminuation of the federal jury
31. Effects of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: An experiment in a federal distric court