New models for the analysis of paired comparison data; Segmentation of the panel

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 71-76

  Qannari, El Mostafa ^a   Courcoux, Philippe ^a   Séménou, Michel ^a  

^a LUNAM UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033637946     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00056-7     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern Multidimensional Scaling, Theory and Applications. Springer series of statistics.
2. Bradley R.A., Terry M.E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. the method of paired comparisons Biometrika. 39:1952;324-345.
3. Constantine A.G., Gower J.C. Graphical representation of asymmetric matrices. Applied Statistics. 27(3):1978;297-304.
4. Courcoux P.H., Séménou M. Preference data analysis using a paired comparison model. Food Quality and Preference. 8(5/6):1997;353-358.
5. David H.A. The Method of Paired Comparisons. 1988;Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal Components Analysis. Sage publications.
7. Gower, J. C. (1977). The analysis of asymmetry and orthogonality. In Barra et al., Recent Developments in Statistics (pp. 109-123). North-Holland.
8. Gower J.C. Problems in interpreting asymmetrical relationships. Bisby F.A., Vaughan J.G., Wright C.A. Chemosystematics: principle and practice. 1980;399-409 Academic Press, London.
9. Gower J.C., Digby P.G. Expressing complex relationships in two dimensions. Barnett V. Interpreting multivariate data. 1981;83-118 Wiley, New York.
10. Thurstone L.L. A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review. 34:1927;273-286.
11. Zielman B., Heiser W.J. Models for asymmetric proximities. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 49:1966;127-146.