What's up doc? jaffee v. Redmond and the psychotherapeutic privilege in criminal justice

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-11

  Colledge, Dale ^a   Zeigler, Frank ^b   Hemmens, Craig ^c   Hodge, Carl ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TDCJ Trial Services   (United States)

^c BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033636265     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00027-6     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Psychological Association (APA). (1992). Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Archer, M. (1997) All aboard the bandwagon: The uncertain scope of the federal psychotherapist-client privilege in the aftermath of Jaffee v. Redmond. Wash Univ J Urban & Contemp Law 52(Summer), 355-374.
3. Bressman, M., & Laguarda, F. (1997). Jaffee v. Redmond: Towards recognition of a federal counselor-battered woman privilege. Creighton Law Rev 30(2), 319-351.
4. Bryson, M. (1997). Protecting confidential communications between a psychotherapist and patient: Jaffee v. Redmond. Cath Univ Law Rev 46(3), 963-1004.
5. DaBell, C., & Jones, R. (1997). Privileged communication at last? An overview of Jaffee v. Redmond. Pro Psych: Res & Prac 28(6), 559-566.
6. Fulkerson, B. (1997). One step forward, two steps back: The recognized but undefined federal psychotherapist-patient privilege. MO Law Rev 62(3), 401-424.
7. Glosoff, H., Herlihy, S., Herlihy, B., & Spence, E. (1997). Privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship. Pro Psych: Res & Prac 28(6), 573-581.
8. Gunter, J. (1997). Jaffee v. Redmond: The Supreme Court recognizes the psychotherapist-patient privilege in the federal courts and expands it to include social workers. Nova Law Rev 21(2), 719-739.
9. Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (1997). Jaffee v. Redmond: The Supreme Court recognizes a psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts. Pro Psych: Res & Prac 28(6), 567-572.
10. Mapp, G. (1997). Jaffee v. Redmond: Supreme Court recognition of protected psychotherapist privilege. Am J Trial Adv 20(3), 679-684.
11. Remley, T. P., Herlihy, B., & Herlihy, S. B. (1997). The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Jaffee v. Redmond: Implications for counselors. J Coun & Dev 75(3), 213-218.
12. Sands, H., Hinnefeld, B., Towers, K., & Higuchi, S. A. (1997). Practitioners alert: Confidentiality. Psychoanal & Psychother 14(1), 157-170.
13. Slovenko, R. (1974). The psychotherapist-patient testimonial privilege: A picture of misguided hope. Cath Univ Law Rev 23, 649-673.
14. Slovenko, R. (1997). The psychotherapist-patient testimonial privilege. Am J Psychoanal 57(1), 63-74.
15. Slovenko, R. (1998). Psychotherapy and Confidentiality: Testimonial Privileged Communication, Breach of Confidentiality, and Reporting Duties. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
16. Stone, M. (1997). Jaffee v. Redmond: The Supreme Court adopts a federal psychotherapist-privilege and extends the scope to encompass licensed social workers. Mercer Law Rev 48(3), 1283-1295.
17. Wadsworth, J. (1997). Recognition of a federal psychotherapist-patient privilege. Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996). Land & Water Law Rev 32(1), 873-890. Commonwealth v. Fuller, 667 N.E.2d 847 (Ma. 1996). In re Grand Jury, 103 F.3d 1140 (3d Cir. 1997). Jaffee v. Redmond, 51 F.3d 1346 (1995). Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996). Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). Menendez v. Superior Court, 834 P.2d 788 (Ca. Sup. 1992). State v. Bright, 683 A.2d 1055 (Del. Sup. 1996). State v. Smith, 933 S.W.2d 450 (Tenn. 1996). Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Ca. Sup. 1976). United States v. Bishop, 149 F.3d 1185 (6th Cir. 1998). United States v. D.F., 63 F.3d 671 (7th Cir. 1995). United States v. Doyle, 1 F.Supp.2d 1187 (9th Cir. 1998). United States v. Dunford, 148 F.3d 385 (4th Cir. 1998). United States v. Glass, 133 F.3d 1356 (10th Cir. 1998). United States v. Horton, 98 F.3d 321 (7th Cir. 1996). United States v. Newman, 889 F.2d 88 (4th Cir. 1999). United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).