Jaffee v. Redmond: The supreme court recognizes a psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 567-572

  Knapp, Samuel ^a   Vandecreek, Leon ^b  

^a Pennsylvania Psychological Association   (United States)

^b WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031481767     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.28.6.567     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Appelbaum, P. S., Kapen, G., Walters, B., Lidz, C., & Roth, L. H. (1984). Confidentiality: An empirical test of the utilitarian perspective. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 12, 109-116.
2. Commonwealth v. Mandeville, 436 N.E.2d 912 (Mass. 1982).
3. In re Doe, 711 F.2d 1187 (2nd Cir. 1983).
4. In re PAAR [Pittsburgh Action Against Rape], 428 A.2d 126 (1981).
5. Jaffee v. Redmond, 51 F.3d 1346 (7th Cir. 1995).
6. Jaffee v. Redmond, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (S. Ct. 1996).
7. Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (1987). Privileged communication in the mental health professions. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
8. Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (1988). Privileged communications for psychotherapists in federal courts: "In light of reason and experience." Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 6, 69-78.
9. McGuire, J., Toal, P., & Blau, B. (1985). The adult client's conception of confidentiality in the therapeutic relationship. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 375-384.
10. Miller, D. J., & Thelen, M. H. (1986). Knowledge and beliefs about confidentiality in psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 15-19.
11. Miller v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc., 81 F.R.D. 741 (M.D. Pa. 1979).
12. Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence 501, 56 F.R.D. 230 (1973).
13. Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence 504, 56 F.R.D. 242 (1973).
14. Seligman, M. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports survey. American Psychologist, 50, 965-974.
15. S. Rep. No. 1277, 93rd Cong., (1974).
16. Slovenko, R. (1974). Psychotherapist-patient testimonial privilege: A picture of misguided hope. Catholic University Law Review, 23. 649-673.
17. Slovenko, R., & Usdin, G. (1961). The psychiatric and privileged communications. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 431-444.
18. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. State v. Driscoll, 53 Wisc.2d 699, 193 N.W.2d 851, 50 ALR 3d 554 (1972).
20. State v. Gotfrey, 598 P.2d 1325 (Utah 1979).
21. State v. Vickers, 633 P.2d 315 (Ariz. 1981).
22. Wigmore, J. (1961). Evidence in trials at common law (Vol. 8). Boston: Little & Brown.