Alternatives to data averaging of consumer preference data

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 99-104

  Tang, Chen ^a   Heymann, Hildegarde ^b   Hsieh, Fu hung ^b  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0033634617     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(99)00019-1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Jones P.N., MacFie H.J.H., Beilken S.L. Use of preference mapping to relate consumer preference to the sensory properties of a processed meat product (tinned cat food). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 47:1989;113-123.
2. MacFie H.J.H., Hedderley D. Current practice in relating sensory perception to instrumental measurements. Food Quality and Preference. 4:1993;41-49.
3. Martens M., Martens H. Partial least squares regression. Piggott J.R. Statistical procedures in food research. 1988;293-359 Elsevier Applied Science, London.
4. McEwan J.A. Preference mapping for product optimization. Naes T., Risvik E. Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science. 1996;71-102 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
5. Moskowitz H.R., Krieger B. The contribution of sensory liking to overall liking: an analysis of six food categories. Food Quality and Preference. 6:1995;83-90.
6. Muňoz A., Chambers E. Relating sensory measurements to consumer acceptance of meat products. Food Technology. 47(11):1993;128-134.
7. Neter J., Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim C.J., Wasserman W. Multiple Regression - I. Richard D. Applied linear statistical Models. 1996;217-241 Chicago, IL, Irwin.
8. Popper R., Heymann H., Rossi F. Three multivariate approaches to relating consumer to descriptive data. Muňoz A.M. ASTM manual on consumer data relationships. 1997;39-61 ASTM, Philadelphia.
9. Schlich, P. (1995). Preference mapping: Relating consumer preferences to sensory or instrumental measurements. In P. Etievant, & P. Schreier, Bioflavour: Analysis/precursor Studies/biotechnology. Versailles: INRA Editions.
10. Stevens, J. (1986). Canonical correlation. In Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (pp. 373-401). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. ® Software: Changes and Enhancement Through Release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
12. Tunaley A., Thomson D.M.H., McEwan J.A. An investigation of the relationship between preference and the sensory characteristics of nine sweeteners. Thomson D.M.H. Food acceptability. 1996;387-401 Elsevier Science, London.
13. Van der Burg E., Dijksternhuis G. Generalised canonical analysis of individual sensory profiles and instrumental data. Naes T., Risvik E. Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science. 1996;221-255 Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.