Noninvasive evaluation of coronary bypass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging. Comparison of the haste and Fisp-3-D sequences with the conventional coronary angiography;Kernspintomographische darstellung koronarer bypassgefasse - Vergleich der haste- und Fisp-3-D-angiographiesequenz mit der konventionellen koronarangiographie

Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 7-14

  Wittlinger, Th ^a   Voigtlander T ^a   Grauvogel, K ^a   Meyer, J ^a   Kreitner, K F ^b   Kalden, P ^b   Thelen, M ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary artery bypass grafts; Magnetic resonance imaging; MR

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPROMIDE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ANASTOMOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT OCCLUSION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IOHEXOL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033621969     PISSN: 03005860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003920050002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 1. Erdmann E, Riecker G (1996) Klinische Kardiologie: Krankheiten des Herzens, des Kreislaufs und der herznahen Gefäße. 4. vollkommen überarb. und erw. Aufl. Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
2. 2. Statistik der Gesamtleistungen (1997) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herz-, Thorax-und Gefäßchirurgie
3. 3. Kirklin JW, Naftel DC, Blackstone EH, Prohost EH, Pohost GM (1989) Summary of a consensus concerning death and ischemic events after coronary bypass grafting. Circulation 79 (Suppl I):81-91
4. 4. Grondin CMN, Campeau L, Thornton JC, et al (1989) Coronary artery bypass grafting with saphenous vein. Circulation 79 (Suppl I):24-29
5. 5. Campeau L, Enjalbert M, Lesperance J, et al (1993) Atherosclerotic and late closure of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts: sequential angiographic studies at 2 weeks, 1 year, 5 to 7 years and 10 to 12 years after surgery. Circulation 68 (Suppl II): 1-5
6. 6. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM (1989) New arteries for old. Circulation 79 (Suppl I):40-45
7. 7. Detre K, Peduzzi P, Murphy M. et al (1981) Effect of bypass surgery on survival in patients with low-and high-risk groups delineated by the use of simple clinical variables. Circulation 63:1329-38
8. 8. Peduzzi P, Detre K, Murphy ML (1991) Ten-years incidence of myocardial infarction and prognosis after infarction: Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Circulation 83:747-55
9. 9. Wyman RM, Safian RD, Portway V, Skillman JJ, McKay RG, Baim DS (1988) Current complications of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:1400-1406
10. 10. Galjee MA, van Rossum AC, Doesburg T, van Eenige MJ, Visser CA (1996) Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. An angiographically controlled study. Circulation 93:660-666
11. 11. Lakkis N, Mahmarian JJ, Verani SM (1995) Exercise thallium 201 single photon emission computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. Amer J Cardiol 76:107-111
12. 12. Aurigemma GP, Reichek N, Axel L, Schiebler M, Harris C, Kressel HY (1989) Noninvasive determination of coronary artery graft patency by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 80:1595-1602
13. 13. Gomes AS, Lois JF, Drinkwater DC, Corday SR (1987) Coronary artery bypass grafts: visualization with MR imaging. Radiology 162:175-179
14. 14. Knoll P, Bonatti G, Pitscheider W, Psenner K, Ehrlicher A, Zammarchi A, Crepaz R (1994) Die Wertigkeit der Kernspintomographie bei der Beurteilung der Durchgängigkeit von aortokoronaren Grafts. Z Kardiol 83:439-445
15. 15. Theissen P, Sechtem U, Langkamp S, Jungshulsing M, Hilger HH, Schicha H (1989) Nichtinvasive Beurteilung aortokoronarer Venenbrücken mit der Kernspintomographie. Nuklearmedizin 28: 234-242
16. 16. Rubinstein RI, Askenase AD, Thichmann D, Feldman MS, Agarwal JB, Helfant RH (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts. Circulation 76:786-791
17. 17. Van Rossum AC, Galjee MA, Doesburg T, Hofman M, Valk J (1993) The role of magnetic resonance in the evaluation of functional results after CABG/PTCA. Int J Card Imaging 1:59-69
18. 18. Von Smekal A, Knez A, Seelos KC, Haberl R, Spiegl F, Reichart B, Steinbeck G, Reiser M (1997) Vergleich von ultraschneller Computertomographie, Magnetresonanztomographie und selektiver Angiographie zum Nachweis der Durchgängigkeit koronarer Bypässe. Fortschr Röntgenstr 166:185-191
19. 19. White RD, Caputo GR, Mark AS, Modin GW, Higgins CB (1987) Coronary artery bypass graft patency: Noninvasive evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 164:681-686
20. 20. White RD, Pflugfelder PW, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB (1988) Coronary artery bypass grafts: Evaluation of patency with cine MR imaging. Amer J Roentgenol 150: 1271-1274
21. 21. Wintersberger BJ, Von Smekal A, Engelmann MG, Knez A, Penzkover HV, Laub G, Reiser M (1997) Kontrastmittelverstärkte Magnetresonanzangiographie zur Überprüfung der Durchgängigkeit koronarer Bypässe. Fortschr Röntgenstr 167,6:572-578
22. 22. Wicke K, Mühlberger V, Judmair W, Moes N, zur Nedden D (1991) Die Wertigkeit von CT und MRT bei der Erfassung von aortokoronaren Venenbrücken im Vergleich zur Koronarangiographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 154:306-309
23. 23. Stehling MK, von Smekal A, Reiser M (1994) MRT der Koronararterien: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Radiologe 34:462-468
24. 24. Hoogendorn LI, Pattynama PM, Buis B, van der Gest RJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A (1995) Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Amer J Cardiol 75:845-848
25. 25. Vrachliotis GT, Bis KG, Alibadi G, Shetty AN, Safian R, Simonetti O (1997) Contrast enhanced breath-hold MR angiography for evaluating patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. AJR 168:1073-80
26. 26. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS 1983) A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups. Circulation 68:951-960