Decline in Cigarette Consumption Following Implementation of a Comprehensive Tobacco Prevention and Education Program - Oregon, 1996-1998

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 140-143

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; SMOKING; TAX; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; OREGON; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SMOKING; TAXES; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

EID: 0033604936     PISSN: 01492195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Has the California Tobacco Control Program reduced smoking? JAMA 1998;280:893-9.
2. Connolly G, Robbins H. Designing an effective statewide tobacco control program -Massachusetts. Cancer Supplement 1998;83:2722-7.
3. Center for Population Research and Census. Population estimates for Oregon, July 1, 1998. Portland, Oregon: Portland State University, College of Urban and Public Affairs, 1998.
4. Anonymous. Monthly state cigarette tax reports, Jan. 1997 to Jul. 1998. Washington, DC: The Tobacco Institute, 1998.
5. Population Estimates Program, Bureau of the Census, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Department of Commerce. State population estimates: annual time series, July 1, 1990 to July 1, 1998. 〈World-Wide Web site http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/state/ st-98-3.txt〉 Accessed February 10, 1999.
6. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The economics of smoking. In: Newhouse J, Culyer A, eds. The handbook of health economics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1999 (in press).
7. CDC. Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an antismoking campaign -Massachusetts, 1990-1996. MMWR 1996;45:966-70.
8. Anonymous. The tax burden on tobacco: historical compilation. Vol 32. Washington, DC: The Tobacco Institute, 1997.