Evaluation of NHS direct

BMJ

Volumn 319, Issue 7208, 1999, Pages 521-

  Mckenna, Kevin ^a   Reynolds, Mark ^b  

^a Bondgate Practice   (United States)

^b Natl Assoc General Practice Coops   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; UNITED KINGDOM; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EVALUATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; LETTER; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

GREAT BRITAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 0033592089     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7208.521     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Florin D, Rosen R. Evaluating NHS Direct. BMJ 1999; 319: 5–6. (3 July.)
2. Wuerz R, Fernandes CM, Alarcon J. Inconsistency of emergency department triage. Emergency Department Operations Research Working Group. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32: 431–435.
3. Hallam L, Henthorne K. Providing out of hours primary care in Northumberland: an evaluation of the development, operations and impact of the Northumberland out of hours co-operative. In: Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, 1999.
4. Wachter DA, Brillman JC, Lewis J, Spaien RE. Pediatric telephone triage protocols: standardized decision making or a false sense of security? Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 388–394.
5. Florin D, Rosen R. Evaluating NHS Direct. BMJ 1999; 319: 5–6.