Exploiting the self-assembly strategy for the design of selective Cu(II) ion chemosensors

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 38, Issue 20, 1999, Pages 3061-3064

  Grandini, Patrizia ^a   Mancin, Fabrizio ^a   Tecilla, Paolo ^a,b   Scrimin, Paolo ^a   Tonellato, Umberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Copper; Fluorescent sensor; Micelles; Self assembly; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

COPPER ION;

ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COVALENT BOND; METAL BINDING; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033581621     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19991018)38:20<3061::AID-ANIE3061>3.0.CO;2-A     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. a) "Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Molecule Recognition": ACS Symp. Ser. 1993, 538; b) A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J. M. Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher, T. E. Rice, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515-1566.
2. a) "Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Molecule Recognition": ACS Symp. Ser. 1993, 538; b) A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J. M. Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher, T. E. Rice, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515-1566.
3. R. Krämer, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 804-806; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 772-773.
4. R. Krämer, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 804-806; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 772-773.
5. G. De Santis, L. Fabbrizzi, M. Lichelli, C. Mangano, D. Sacchi, N. Sardone, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1997, 257, 69-76.
6. J. Yoon, N. E. Ohler, D. H. Vance, W. D. Aumiller, A. W. Czarnik, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3845-3848.
7. A. Torrado, G. K. Walkup, B. Imperiali, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 609-610.
8. R. Corradini, A. Dossena, G. Galaverna, R. Marchelli, A. Panagia, G. Sartori, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6283-6289.
9. P. Ghosh, P. K. Bharadwaj, S. Mandal, S. Ghosh, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1553-1554.
10. D. Y. Sasaki, D. R. Shnek, D. W. Pack, F. H. Arnold, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 994-996; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 905-907.
11. D. Y. Sasaki, D. R. Shnek, D. W. Pack, F. H. Arnold, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 994-996; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 905-907.
12. A different approach to a self-assembling sensor is based on the competition between the target substrate and the dye for the receptor. For a recent example, see A. Metzger, E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 682-684; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 649-651.
13. A different approach to a self-assembling sensor is based on the competition between the target substrate and the dye for the receptor. For a recent example, see A. Metzger, E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 682-684; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 649-651.
14. For a different strategy to self-assembling systems, see J. W. Canary, B. C. Gibb, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 45, 1.
15. H. Siegel, R. B. Martin, Chem. Rev. 1982, 82, 385-426.
16. -1 at 375 nm). Experiments performed in the presence of excess EDTA show that at least 30% of the quenching observed is a result of the absorbtion of the exciting light.
17. M. C. Cleij, P. Scrimin, P. Tecilla, U. Tonellato, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5592-5599.