-
3
-
-
0042542659
-
-
FISHER M. E. and LEVIN Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 71 (1993) 3826; LEVIN Y. and FISHER M. E., Physica A, 225 (1996) 164.
-
(1996)
Physica A
, vol.225
, pp. 164
-
-
Levin, Y.1
Fisher, M.E.2
-
10
-
-
0031095657
-
-
GRØNBECH-JENSEN N., MASHL R. J., BRUINSMA R. F. and GELBART W. M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 (1997) 2477; HA B.-Y. and LIU A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 79 (1997) 1289; SCHMITZ K. S., Langmuir, 13 (1997) 5849.
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.78
, pp. 2477
-
-
Grønbech-Jensen, N.1
Mashl, R.J.2
Bruinsma, R.F.3
Gelbart, W.M.4
-
11
-
-
0000888701
-
-
GRØNBECH-JENSEN N., MASHL R. J., BRUINSMA R. F. and GELBART W. M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 (1997) 2477; HA B.-Y. and LIU A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 79 (1997) 1289; SCHMITZ K. S., Langmuir, 13 (1997) 5849.
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.79
, pp. 1289
-
-
Ha, B.-Y.1
Liu, A.J.2
-
12
-
-
0031248380
-
-
GRØNBECH-JENSEN N., MASHL R. J., BRUINSMA R. F. and GELBART W. M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 (1997) 2477; HA B.-Y. and LIU A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 79 (1997) 1289; SCHMITZ K. S., Langmuir, 13 (1997) 5849.
-
(1997)
Langmuir
, vol.13
, pp. 5849
-
-
Schmitz, K.S.1
-
14
-
-
0000840189
-
-
KEPLER G. M. and FRADEN S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 73 (1994) 356; CROCKER J. C. and GRIER D. G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 77 (1996) 1897; LARSEN A. E. and GRIER D. G., Nature, 385 (1997) 231.
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.73
, pp. 356
-
-
Kepler, G.M.1
Fraden, S.2
-
15
-
-
5244364958
-
-
KEPLER G. M. and FRADEN S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 73 (1994) 356; CROCKER J. C. and GRIER D. G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 77 (1996) 1897; LARSEN A. E. and GRIER D. G., Nature, 385 (1997) 231.
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.77
, pp. 1897
-
-
Crocker, J.C.1
Grier, D.G.2
-
16
-
-
0000840189
-
-
KEPLER G. M. and FRADEN S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 73 (1994) 356; CROCKER J. C. and GRIER D. G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 77 (1996) 1897; LARSEN A. E. and GRIER D. G., Nature, 385 (1997) 231.
-
(1997)
Nature
, vol.385
, pp. 231
-
-
Larsen, A.E.1
Grier, D.G.2
-
17
-
-
0001466936
-
-
ABE R., Prog. Theor. Phys., 22 (1959) 213; DEUTSCH C., FURUTANI Y. and GOMBERT M. M., Phys. Rep., 69 (1981) 85.
-
(1959)
Prog. Theor. Phys.
, vol.22
, pp. 213
-
-
Abe, R.1
-
18
-
-
0002224190
-
-
ABE R., Prog. Theor. Phys., 22 (1959) 213; DEUTSCH C., FURUTANI Y. and GOMBERT M. M., Phys. Rep., 69 (1981) 85.
-
(1981)
Phys. Rep.
, vol.69
, pp. 85
-
-
Deutsch, C.1
Furutani, Y.2
Gombert, M.M.3
-
20
-
-
36449002384
-
-
KHOLODENKO A. L. and BEYERLEIN A. L., Phys. Rev. A, 34 (1986) 3309; COALSON R. D. and DUNCAN A., J. Chem. Phys., 97 (1992) 5653.
-
(1992)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.97
, pp. 5653
-
-
Coalson, R.D.1
Duncan, A.2
-
22
-
-
0031572031
-
-
LEE B. P. and FISHER M. E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 76 (1996) 2906; Europhys. Lett., 39 (1997) 611.
-
(1997)
Europhys. Lett.
, vol.39
, pp. 611
-
-
-
24
-
-
0003527976
-
-
(Harper & Row, New York), Chapt. 15
-
Note that virial expansion methods fail for ionic fluids, as shown in MCQUARRIE D. A., Statistical Mechanics (Harper & Row, New York) 1976, Chapt. 15.
-
(1976)
Statistical Mechanics
-
-
McQuarrie, D.A.1
-
25
-
-
0009211112
-
-
It is easily seen that a small-distance cutoff a is needed in order to make the correlation function normalizable. We interpret this cutoff as an effective hard-core radius (or particle diameter)
-
It is easily seen that a small-distance cutoff a is needed in order to make the correlation function normalizable. We interpret this cutoff as an effective hard-core radius (or particle diameter).
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
0009142456
-
-
note
-
4 + ⋯. The DH interaction thus is the renormalized interaction which results from all possible combinations of indirect interaction terms mediated by salt ions.
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
0009142771
-
-
An effective attractive interaction does not necessarily mean coagulation of particles, since the centrifugal potential (which is logarithmic) has to be overcome
-
An effective attractive interaction does not necessarily mean coagulation of particles, since the centrifugal potential (which is logarithmic) has to be overcome.
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
0009290157
-
-
note
-
MC estimates of critical parameters for Z/z = 1 range from c̃ ≃ 0.07, ∈ ≃ 14.3 [5] to c̃ ≃ 0.03, ∈ ≃ 17.5 [2]; we attribute the discrepancy to our results, especially in ∈, to our approximate way of including the hardcore repulsion. The improved DH theory yields c̃ ≃ 0.028 and ∈ ≃ 17.5 [2].
-
-
-
|