Charge oscillations in Debye-Hückel theory

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 611-616

  Lee, B P ^a   Fisher, M E ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031572031     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i1997-00402-x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. See, e.g., FISHER M. E., J. Stat. Phys., 75 (1994) 1; J. Phys. Condens. Matt., 8 (1996) 9103.
2. See, e.g., FISHER M. E., J. Stat. Phys., 75 (1994) 1; J. Phys. Condens. Matt., 8 (1996) 9103.
3. a) DEBYE P. and HÜCKEL E., Phys. Z., 24 (1923) 185. For a modern presentation, and the low-density results, see b) D. A. MCQUARRIE, Statistical Mechanics (Harper-Collins, New York) 1976, chapt. 15.
4. a) DEBYE P. and HÜCKEL E., Phys. Z., 24 (1923) 185. For a modern presentation, and the low-density results, see b) D. A. MCQUARRIE, Statistical Mechanics (Harper-Collins, New York) 1976, chapt. 15.
5. a) FISHER M. E. and LEVIN Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 71 (1993) 3826, b) LEVIN Y. and FISHER M. E., Physica A, 225 (1996) 164.
6. a) FISHER M. E. and LEVIN Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 71 (1993) 3826, b) LEVIN Y. and FISHER M. E., Physica A, 225 (1996) 164.
7. a) STILLINGER F. H. and LOVETT R., J. Chem. Phys., 48 (1968) 3858, b) J. Chem. Phys., 49 (1968) 1991.
8. a) STILLINGER F. H. and LOVETT R., J. Chem. Phys., 48 (1968) 3858, b) J. Chem. Phys., 49 (1968) 1991.
9. Κ ≃ 1.03; see eq. (5).
10. Κ < 1.3.
11. LEOTE DE CARVALHO R. J. F. and EVANS R.,
12. a) Mol. Phys., 83 (1994) 619;
13. Κ ≃ 1.229; see
14. OUTHWAITE C. W. and HUTSON V. C. L., Mol. Phys., 29 (1975) 1521.
15. LEE B. P. and FISHER M. E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 76 (1996) 2906.
16. 1/2 and, in the following sentence, by changing ξGMSA to ξ∞GMSA.
17. LEE B. P. and FISHER M. E., to be published.
18. ZUCKERMAN D. M., FISHER M. E. and LEE B. P., submitted for publication.
19. BEKIRANOV S. and FISHER M. E., (in preparation) based on the analysis of MEERON E., J. Chem. Phys., 28 (1958) 630.
20. HC cancel out of (9).
21. For locally charge-neutral density variations, as considered in [8], Φ(r) vanishes and the separation (15) is unnecessary.
22. FISHER M. E. and LEE B. P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 77 (1996) 3561.