Protein recovery from bacterial cell debris using crossflow microfiltration with backpulsing

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 259-268

  Parnham, Charles S ^a,b   Davis, Robert H ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b Field Advantage Medical Communications   (United States)

Author keywords

Backpulsing; Biotechnology; Fouling; Microfiltration

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BACTERIUM LYSATE;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MICROFILTRATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR RATE;

FOULING; MICROFILTRATION-CROSSFLOW; SEPARATION;

BACTERIA; BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPOSITION EFFECTS; FOULING; PRESSURE EFFECTS; PROTEINS;

BACTERIAL CELL DEBRIS; CROSSFLOW MICROFILTRATION; PROTEIN RECOVERY; RAPID BACKPULSING;

FILTRATION;

EID: 0030592201     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(96)00108-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. [1] G. Belfort, R.H. Davis and A.L. Zydney, The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration, J. Membrane Sci., 96 (1994) 1-58.
2. [2] R. Datar, Studies on the separation of intracellular soluble enzymes from bacterial cell debris by tangential flow membrane filtration, Biotechnol. Lett., 7 (1985) 471-476.
3. [3] R.H. Davis, Theory of crossflow microfiltration, in W.S.W. Ho and K.K. Sirkar (Eds.), Membrane Handbook, 1st edn., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1992, pp. 480-505.
4. [4] S.M. Forman, E.R. DeBernardez, R.S. Feldberg and R.W. Swartz, Crossflow filtration for the separation of inclusion bodies from soluble proteins in recombinant Escherichia coli cell lysate, J. Membrane Sci., 48 (1990) 263-279.
5. [5] R.G. Harrison, Large scale process for the purification of alcohol oxidase, US Pat., 4,956,290 (1990).
6. [6] G. Jonnson and I.G. Wenten, Control of concentration polarization, fouling, and protein transmission of microfiltration processes within the agro based industry, Workshop ASEAN-EU on Membrane Technology in Agro-based Industry, Kuala Lumpur, July 1994, pp. 157-166.
7. [7] K.H. Kroner, H. Schútte, H. Hustedt and M R. Kula, Crossflow filtration in the downstream processing of enzymes, Proc. Biochem., 19 (1984) 67-74.
8. [8] M.S. Le, L.B. Spark and P.S. Ward, The separation of aryl acylamindase by cross flow microfiltration and the significance of enzyme/cell debris interaction, J. Membrane Sci., 21 (1984) 219.
9. [9] J.A. Levesley and M. Hoare, The effect of high frequency backflushing on the microfiltration of yeast homogenate suspensions for the recovery of soluble proteins, Biotechnol. Bioeng., submitted.
10. [10] C.S. Parnham and R.H. Davis, Protein recovery from cell debris using crossflow microfiltration, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 47 (1995) 155-164.
11. [11] M.C. Porter, Applications of membranes to enzyme isolation and purification, Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp., 3 (1972) 115-144.
12. [12] A.V. Quirk and J.R. Woodrow, Tangential flow filtration -A new method for the separation of bacterial enzymes from cell debris, Biotechnol. Lett., 5 (1983) 277-282.
13. [13] A.V. Quirk and J.R. Woodrow, Investigation of the parameters affecting the separation of bacterial enzyme from cell debris by tangential flow filtration, Enz. Microb. Technol., 6 (1984) 201-206.
14. [14] S.G. Redkar and R.H. Davis, Enhancement of crossflow microfiltration performance using high frequency reverse filtration, AIChE J., 41 (1995) 501-508.
15. [15] V.G.J. Rodgers and R.E. Sparks, Reduction of membrane fouling in the ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures, AIChE J., 37 (1991) 1517-1528.
16. [16] V.G.J. Rodgers and R.E. Sparks, Effects of transmembrane pressure pulsing on concentration polarization, J. Membrane Sci., 68 (1992) 149-169.