Body size and migration rate in moths

Ecography

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 697-707

  Nieminen, Marko ^a   Rita, Hannu ^a   Uuvana, Paavo ^b  

^a Division of Population Biology   (Finland)

^b NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BODY SIZE; MIGRATION; MOTH;

INVERTEBRATA; LEPIDOPTERA; NOCTUIDAE;

EID: 0033509261     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00519.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Blackburn, T. M. and Gaston, K. J. 1998. Some methodological issues in macroecology. - Am. Nat. 151: 68-83.
2. Blackburn, T. M. et al. 1993. The relationship between abundance and body size in natural animal assemblages. - J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 519-528.
3. Bock, C. E. and Ricklefs, R. E. 1983. Range size and local abundance of some North American songbirds: a positive correlation. - Am. Nat. 122: 295-299.
4. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124: 255-279.
5. Brown, J. H. and Maurer, B. A. 1989. Macroecology: the division of food and space among species on continents. -Science 243: 1145-1150.
6. Dempster, J. P. 1991. Fragmentation, isolation and mobility of insect populations. In: Collins, N. M. and Thomas, J. A. (eds), Conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, pp. 143-154.
7. Dempster, J. P., King, M. L. and Lakhani, K. H. 1976. The status of the swallowtail butterfly in Britain. - Ecol. Entomol. 1: 71-84.
8. Den Boer, P. J. 1968. Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. - Acta Biotheoret. 18: 165-194.
9. Diamond, J. M. 1984. Normal extinctions of isolated populations. - In: Nitecki, M. H. (ed.). Extinctions. Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 191-246.
10. Dingle, H. 1980. Ecology and evolution of migration. - In: Gauthreaux, Jr. S. A. (ed.), Animal migration, orientation, and navigation. Academic Press, pp. 1-101.
11. Gadgil, M. 1971. Dispersal: population consequences and evolution. - Ecology 52: 253-261.
12. Gaston, K. J. 1988. Patterns in the local and regional dynamics of moth populations. - Oikos 53: 49-57.
13. Gaston, K. J. 1994, Rarity. - Chapman and Hall.
14. Gaston, K. J. 1995. Rarity and body size: some cautionary remarks. - Conserv. Biol. 9: 210-213.
15. Gaston, K. J. and Lawton, J. H. 1988a. Patterns in the distribution and abundance of insect populations. - Nature 331: 709-712.
16. Gaston, K. J. and Lawton, J. H. 1988b. Patterns in body size, population dynamics, and regional distribution of bracken herbivores. - Am. Nat. 132: 662-680.
17. Haila, Y. et al. 1989. Kaupunkiviheriöiden kasvillisuuden vaihtelu hyönteisten esiintymistä määräävänä tekijänä. Pääkaupunkiseudun julkaisusarja C 1989:4. Helsingin kaupungin kaupunkisuunnitteluviraston yleiskaavaosasto and Pääkaupunkiseudun yhteistyövaltuuskunta. Helsinki.
18. Hamilton, W. D. and May, R. M. 1977. Dispersal in stable habitats. - Nature 269: 578-581.
19. Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. - Oikos 38: 210-221.
20. Hanski, I. 1991. Reply to Nee, Gregory and May. - Oikos 62: 88-89.
21. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. - Nature 396: 41-49.
22. Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. E. 1997. Metapopulation biology, Ecology, genetics, and evolution. - Academic Press.
23. Hanski, I. and Gyllenberg, M. 1997. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. - Science 275: 397-400.
24. Hanski, I. and Zhang, D.-Y. 1993. Migration, metapopulation dynamics and fugitive coexistence. J. Theor. Biol. 163: 491-504.
25. Hanski, I., Kouki, J. and Halkka, A. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. - In: Ricklefs, R. E. and Schluter, D. (eds), Historical and geographical determinants of community diversity. Chicago Univ. Press, pp. 108-116.
26. Harvey, P. H. 1996. Phytogenies for ecologists. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 255-263.
27. Heath, J. and Emmet, A. (eds) 1979. The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. 9. Curwen Books.
28. Heath, J. and Emmet, A. (eds) 1983. The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. 10. Harley Books.
29. Holt, R. D. et al. 1997. On the relationship between range size and local abundance: back to basics. - Oikos 78: 183-190.
30. Hutchinson, G. E. and MacArthur, R. H. 1959. A theoretical model of size distributions among species of animals. -Am. Nat. 93: 117-125.
31. Inkinen, P. 1994. Distribution and abundance in British noctuid moths revisited. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31: 235-243.
32. Itämies, J. 1982. The Lepidoptera succession on the islands off Rauma. SW Finland. - Aq. Ser. Zool. 21: 13-52.
33. Johnson, M. L. and Gaines, M. S. 1990. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 449-480.
34. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. and Hanski, I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 791-801.
35. Lawton, J. H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 409-413.
36. Leibold, M. A. 1995. The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. - Ecology 76: 1371-1382.
37. Lindström, J., Kaila, L. and Niemelä, P. 1994. Polyphagy and adult body size in geometrid moths. - Oecologia 98: 130-132.
38. Loder, N., Gaston, K. J., Warren, P. H. and Arnold, H. R. 1998. Body size and feeding specificity: Macrolepidoptera in Britain. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63: 121-139.
39. Lomnicki, A. 1978. Individual differences between animals and the natural regulation of their numbers. - J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 461-475.
40. McPeek, M. A. and Holt, R. D. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140: 1010-1027.
41. Mikkola, K., Jalas, I. 1977. Suomen perhoset. yökköset 1. Otava, Keuruu.
42. Mikkola, K. and Jalas, I. 1979. Suomen perhoset, yökköset 2. - Otava, Keuruu.
43. Mikkola, K., Jalas, I. and Peltonen, O. 1985. Suomen perhoset. Mittarit 1. - Suomen Perhostutkijain Seura, Tamprint, Tampere.
44. Mikkola, K., Jalas, I. and Peltonen, O. 1989. Suomen perhoset. Mittarit 2. - Suomen Perhostutkijain Seura, Recallmed Oy, Elanko.
45. Nee, S., Gregory, R. D. and May, R. M. 1991. Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts. - Oikos 62: 83-87.
46. Nee, S., Read, A. F. and Harvey, P. H. 1996. Why phytogenies are necessary for comparative analysis. - In: Martins, E. P. (ed.), Phytogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 399-411.
47. Niemelä, P., Hanhimäki, S. and Mannila, R. 1981. The relationship of adult size in noctuid moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) to breadth of diet and growth form of host plants. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 47: 17-20.
48. Nieminen, M. 1996a. Risk of population extinction in moths: effect of host plant characteristics. - Oikos 76: 475-484.
49. Nieminen, M. 1996b. Migration of moth species in a network of small islands. - Oecologia 108: 643-651.
50. Paradis, E. 1998. Interactions between spatial and temporal scales in the evolution of dispersal rate. - Evol. Ecol. 12: 235-244.
51. Quinn, R. M. et al. 1997. Abundance-range size relationships of macrolepidoptera in Britain: the effects of taxonomy and life history variables. - Ecol. Entomol. 22: 453-461.
52. Rankin, M. A. and Burchsted, J. C. A. 1992. The cost of migration in insects. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37: 533-559.
53. Roff, D. A. 1975. Population stability and the evolution of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. - Oecologia 19: 217-237.
54. Roff, D. A. 1991. Life history consequences of bioenergetic and biomechanical constraints on migration. - Am. Zool. 31: 243-251.
55. Rougeot, P.-C. and Viette, P. 1983. Euroopan ja Pohjois-Afrikan kiitäjät ja kehrääjät. - Tammi, Helsinki.
56. Schoener, T. W. and Spiller, D. A. 1987. High population persistence in a system with high turnover. - Nature 330: 474-477.
57. Seppänen, E. J. 1970. Suurperhostoukkien ravintokasvit. -WSOY, Porvoo.
58. Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. 16: 393-430.
59. Southwood, T. R. E. 1962. Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. - Biol. Rev. 37: 171-214.
60. Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H. and Southwood, T. R. E. 1984. Insects on plants. Community patterns and mechanisms. -Blackwell Sci.
61. Taylor, L. R. and Taylor, R. A. J. 1977. Aggregation, migration and population mechanics. - Nature 265: 415-420.
62. Valle, K. J. 1937. Suurperhoset, Macrolepidoptera II. Kiitäjät, Sphinges ja kehrääjät, Bombyces. - WSOY, Porvoo.
63. Varis, V. et al. 1995. Check-list of Finnish Lepidoptera. Suomen perhosten luettelo. - Sahlbergia 2: 1-80.
64. Warren, P. H. and Gaston, K. J. 1997. Interspecific abundance-occupancy relationships: a test of mechanisms using microcosms. - J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 730-742.
65. Wasserman, S. and Mitter, C. 1978. The relationship of body size to breadth of diet in some Lepidoptera. - Ecol. Entomol. 3: 155-160.
66. Wiener, P. and Tuljapurkar, S. 1994. Migration in variable environments: exploring life-history evolution using structured population models. - J. Theor. Biol. 166: 75-90.
67. Williamson, M. 1981. Island populations. - Oxford Univ. Press.
68. Wilson, E. O. and Willis, E. O. 1975. Applied biogeography. -In: Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M. (eds), Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard Univ. Press, pp. 522-534.
69. Wright, D. H. 1991. Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. - J. Biogeogr. 18: 463-466.