Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 230, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 680-685

  Drew, Philip J ^c   Turnbull, Lindsay W ^c   Chatterjee, Sumohan ^c   Read, John ^a   Carleton, Peter J ^c   Fox, John N ^c   Monson, John R T ^c   Kerin, Michael J ^b  

^a CASTLE HILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST LESION; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033498337     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199911000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Merion Thomas J, Fitzharris BM, Redding WH, et al. Clinical examination xeromammography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast tumours. Br Med J 1978; ii:1139-1141.
2. Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Lamb J, Nixon SJ, Forrest APM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology in relationship to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of a solid breast mass. Br J Surg 1984; 71:593-596.
3. Hermansen C, Skovgaard Poulsen H, Jensen J, et al. Diagnostic reliability of combined physical examination, mammography and fine-needle puncture (triple test) in breast tumours. Cancer 1987; 60:1866-1871.
4. Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. Cancer 1982; 32:194-225.
5. Fornage BD. Percutaneous biopsies of the breast: state of the art. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1991; 14:29-39.
6. Donegan WL. Evaluation of a palpable breast mass. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:937-942.
7. Drew PJ, Turnbull LW, Kerin MJ, Carleton PJ, Fox JN. Multicentricity and recurrence of breast cancer [letter]. Lancet 1997; 349:208-209.
8. Drew PJ, Monson JRT. MR mammography. Br J Surg 1996; 83:1316-1318.
9. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Drew PJ, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:516-526.
10. Kerin MJ, Mulligan E, Williams NN, Cronin K, Fitzpatrick JM, Gorey TF. Prospective evaluation of a composite scoring system for mammographically detected cytologically assessed impalpable breast abnormalities. Eur J Surg Oncol 1995: 21:360-363.
11. Parker SH, Stavros AT, Dennis MA. Needle biopsy techniques. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1171-1186.
12. Feig SA, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1205-1230.
13. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. JCAT 1986; 10:199-204.
14. Ballo MS, Sneige N. Can needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma? A comparative study of 124 women. Cancer 1996; 78:773-777.
15. Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1997; 225:241-242.
16. Buckley DL, Drew PJ, Mussurakis S, Monson JRT, Horsman A. Microvessel density of invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI. JMRI 1997; 7:461-464.
17. Mumtaz H, Davidson T, Hall-Craggs MA, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional triple assessment in locally recurrent breast cancer. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1147-1151.
18. Thorp D, Owens RG, Whitehouse G, Dewey ME. Subjective experiences of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 1990; 41:276-278.
19. Rieber A, Tomczak RJ, Mergo PJ, Wenzel V, Zeitler H, Brambs HJ. MRI of the breast in the differential diagnosis of mastitis versus inflammatory carcinoma and follow-up. JCAT 1997; 21(1):128-132.
20. Giard RWM, Hermans J. The value of aspiration cytologic examination of the breast. A statistical review of the medical literature. Cancer 1992; 69:2104-2110.
21. Parker SH, Burnbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core needle biopsy of the breast: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364.
22. Editorial opinion. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Surg 1997; 174:371-385.
23. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Magnetic resonance-guided localisation and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Topics in MRI 1998; 9(1):44-59.
24. Douek M, Vaidya JS, Lakhani SR, et al. Can magnetic resonance imaging help elucidate natural history of breast cancer multicentricity? Lancet 1998; 351:801-802.
25. Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW, et al. Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5(3):265-270.
26. Viehweg P, Paprosch I, Strassinopoulou M, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: interpretation guidelines. Topics in MRI 1998; 9(1):17-43.