Phenology and flower-visiting entomofauna of six species of Lindera (Lauraceae) in Japan

Nordic Journal of Botany

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 707-718

  Dupont, Y L ^a   Kato, M ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOWER VISITING; PHENOLOGY; POLLINATOR;

HONSHU; JAPAN; KYOTO;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LAURACEAE; LINDERA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 0033490403     PISSN: 0107055X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1999.tb00680.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Appanah, S. 1982. Pollination of androdioecious Xerospermum intermedium Radlk. (Sapindaceae) in a rain forest. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 18: 11-34.
2. Bawa, K., S. 1980. Mimicry of male by female flowers and intrasexual competition for pollinators in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) Woodson (Caricaceae). - Evolution 34: 467-474.
3. -1983. Patterns of flowering in tropical plants. - In: Jones, C. E. and Little, R. J. (eds). Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp. 394-410.
4. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224: 223-265.
5. Campbell, D. R. & Motten, A. F. 1985. The mechamism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. -Ecology 66: 554-563.
6. Faegri, K. & van der Pijl, L. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology, ed. 3. - Pergamon Press. Oxford.
7. Feinsinger, P. 1983. Coevolution and pollination. - In: Futuyma, D. J. & Slatkin, M. (eds), Coevolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 282-310.
8. -1987. Effects of plant species on each other's pollination: Is community structure influenced? TREE 2: 123-126.
9. Feldman, D. S. 1987. StatView, II. Abacus concepts, Berkeley.
10. Forfang, A-S. & Olesen, J. M. 1998. Male-biased sex ratio and promiscuous pollination in the dioecious island tree Laurus azorica (Lauraceae). - Pl. Syst. Evol. 212: 143-157.
11. Galen, C. & Gregory, T. 1989. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. - Oecologia 81: 120-123.
12. House, S. M. 1992. Population density and fruit set in three dioecious tree species in Australian tropical rain forest. -J. Ecol. 80: 57-69.
13. Kitamura, S. & Murata, G. 1979. Coloured Illustrations of Woody Plants of Japan, vol. 2. - Hoikusha Publ. Co., Osaka.
14. Kochmer, J. P. & Handel, S. N. 1986. Constraints and competition in the evolution of flowering phenology. - Ecol. Monogr. 56: 303-325.
15. Kubitzki, K., & Kurz, H. 1984. Syncronized dichogamy and dioecy in neotropical Lauraceae. - Pl. Syst. Evol. 147: 253-266.
16. Laverty, T. M. 1992. Plant interactions for pollination visits: a test of the magnet species effect. - Oecologia 89: 502-508.
17. Lloyd, D. G. & Webb, C. J. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. - Bot. Rev. 43: 177-216.
18. McGuire, A. D. & Armbruster, W. S. 1991. An experimental test for reproductive interactions between two sequentially blooming Saxifraga species (Saxifragaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 78: 214-219.
19. Motten, A. F., Campbell, D. R., Alexander, D. E. & Miller, H. L. 1981. Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. - Ecology 62: 1278-1287.
20. Olesen, J. M. & Warncke, E. 1989. Predation and potential transfer of pollen in a population of Saxifraga hirculus. -Holarctic Ecol. 12: 87-95.
21. Petanidou, T. & Vokou, D. 1993. Pollination ecology of Labiatae in a phryganic (East Mediterranean) ecosystem. -Am. J. Bot. 80: 892-899.
22. Primack, R. B. 1985. Sex ratio and sexual constancy in spicebush (Lindera benzoin). - Rhodora 87: 305-308.
23. -& Silander, J. A. 1975. Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants. - Nature 255: 143-144.
24. Proctor, M., Yeo, P. & Lack, A. 1996. The Natural History of Pollination. - Harper Collins Publ., London.
25. Rathcke, B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. - In: Real, L. (ed), Pollination Biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 303-329. Academic Press, Orlando.
26. -1988. Interactions for pollination among coflowering shrubs. - Ecology 69: 446-457.
27. Rohwer, J. G. 1993. Lauraceae. - In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 366-390.
28. Schemske, D. W. & Horvitz, C. C. 1984. Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: A precondition for mutualism specialisation. - Science 225: 519-521.
29. Waser, N. M. 1983. Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: A review of evidence. - In: Jones, C. E. & Little, R. J. (eds), Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp. 277-293.
30. -& Real, L. A. 1979. Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species. - Nature 281: 670-672.
31. -, Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. & Ollerton, J. 1996. Generalisation in pollination systems, and why it matters. - Ecology 77: 1043-1060.
32. Wheelwright, N. T. & Bruneau, A. 1992. Population sex ratios and spatial distribution of Ocotea tenera (Lauraceae) trees in a tropical rain forest. - J. Ecol. 80: 425-432.
33. Wilkinson, L. 1989. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Systat, Inc., Evanston.