An assessment of voting systems under the proximity and directional models of the vote

Public Choice

Volumn 98, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 131-151

  Adams, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033481870     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018387309824     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Achen, C. (1978). Measuring representation. American Journal of Political Science 22: 475-510.
2. Adams, J. (n.d.). Condorcet efficiency and the behavioral model of the vote. The Journal of Politics. Forthcoming.
3. Chamberlin, J. and Cohen, M. (1978). Towards applicable social choice theory: A comparison of social choice functions under spatial model assumptions. American Political Science Review 72: 1341-1356.
4. Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.
5. Converse, P. (1970). Attitudes and nonattitudes: continuation of a dialogue. In: R.E. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1970: 168-190.
6. Cox, G. (1990). Multicandidate spatial competition. In: J. Enelow and M. Hinich (Eds.), Advances in the spatial theory of voting. Cambridge University Press.
7. Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties: Their organization and activities in the modern state. New York: Wiley.
8. Erikson, R. and Romero, D. (1990). Candidate equilibrium and the behavioral model of the vote. American Political Science Review 84: 1103-1126.
9. Iversen, T. (1994). Political leadership and representation in Western European democracies: A test of three models of voting. American Journal of Political Science 38: 45-74.
10. Markus, G. and Converse, P. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review 73: 1055-1070.
11. Macdonald, S.E., and Rabinowitz, G. (1993). Ideology and candidate evaluation. Public Choice 76: 59-78.
12. Mcfadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers of Econometrics. Academic Press, New York.
13. Merrill, S. III (1981). Strategic decisions under one-stage, multicandidate voting systems. Public Choice 36: 115-139.
14. Merrill, S. III (1988). Making multicandidate elections more democratic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15. Merrill, S. III (1993). Voting behavior under the directional spatial model of electoral competition. Public Choice 77: 739-756.
16. Merrill, S. III (1994). A probabilistic model for the spatial distribution of party support in multiparty elections. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 1190-1197.
17. Nixon, D., Olomoki, D., Schofield, N. and Sened, I (1995). Multiparty probabilistic voting: An application to the Knesset. Political economy working paper no. 186: Washington University in St. Louis.
18. Nurmi, H. (1992). An assessment of voting system simulations. Public Choice 73: 459-487.
19. Page, B. and Jones, C. (1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties, and the vote. American Political Science Review 73: 1071-1089.
20. Rabinowitz, G. and Macdonald, S.E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review 83: 93-123.
21. Rabinowitz, G., Macdonald, S.E. and Listhaug, O. (1991). New players in an old game. Comparative Political Studies 24: 147-185.
22. Rivers, D. (1988). Heterogeneity in models of electoral choice. American Journal of Political Science: 737-755.
23. Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis. MIT Press.
24. Weber, R.J. (1977). Comparison of voting systems. New Haven: Cowles Foundation Discussion paper #498A.