Condorcet Efficiency and the Behavioral Model of the Vote

Journal of Politics

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1252-1263

  Adams, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937258280     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2998600     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, Phil Paolino, and David W. Rohde. 1992. “‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 86:55–69.
2. Adams, James. N. d. “An Assessment of Voting Systems under the Proximity and Directional Models of the Vote.” Public Choice (forthcoming).
3. Alvarez, Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1995. “Economics, Issues, and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 39:714–744.
4. Chamberlin, John, and Michael Cohen. 1978. “Towards Applicable Social Choice Theory: A Comparison of Social Choice Functions Under Spatial Model Assumptions.” American Political Science Review 72:1341–1356.
5. Cox, Gary. 1990. “Multicandidate Spatial Competition.” In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, ed. James Enelow and Melvin Hinich. Cambridge University Press.
6. Erikson, Robert, and David Romero. 1990. “Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote.” American Political Science Review 84:1103–1126.
7. Fishburn, Peter, and William Gehrlein. 1977. “Towards a Theory of Elections with Probabilistic Preferences.” Econometrica 45:1907–1924.
8. Iversen, Torben. 1994. “Political Leadership and Representation in Western European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 38:45–74.
9. Markus, Gregory, and Philip Converse. 1979. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 73:1055–1070.
10. Merrill, Samuel III. 1985. “A Statistical Model for Condorcet Efficiency Based on Simulations under Spatial Model Assumptions.” Public Choice 47:389–403.
11. Merrill, Samuel III. 1988. Making Multicandidate Elections More Democratic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12. Merrill, Samuel III. 1993. “Voting Behavior Under the Directional Spatial Model of Electoral Competition.” Public Choice 77:739–756.
13. Merrill, Samuel III. 1994. “A Probabilistic Model for the Spatial Distribution of Party Support in Multi-party Elections.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 89:1190–1197.
14. Nixon, David, Dganit Olomoki, Norman Schofield, and Itai Sened. 1995. “Multiparty Probabilistic Voting: An Application to the Knesset.” Political Economy Working Paper no. 186. St. Louis: Washington University.
15. Nurmi, Hannu. 1992. “An Assessment of Voting System Simulations.” Public Choice 73:459–487.
16. Page, Benjamin, and Calvin Jones. 1979. “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties, and the Vote.” American Political Science Review 73:1071–1089.
17. Rivers, Douglas. 1988. “Heterogeneity in Models of Electoral Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 737–758.
18. Train, Kenneth. 1986. Qualitative Choice Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.