... And this helps me how?: Family child care providers discuss training

Early Childhood Research Quarterly

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 285-312

  Taylor, Andrew R ^a   Dunster, Lee ^b   Pollard, June ^b  

^a Ctr Res and Educ in Hum Serv   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033475232     PISSN: 08852006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00020-4     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Beach, J., Bertrand, J., & Cleveland, G. (1997). Our Child Care Workforce: From Recognition to Remuneration: More than a Labour of Love. Paper prepared for the Child Care Sector Study Steering Committee. Ottawa: Canadian Child Care Federation.
2. Benner, A. (1997). Quality Child Care and Community Development: What is the Connection? Paper prepared for the Partners in Quality Project. Ottawa: Canadian Child Care Federation.
3. Boisvert, D. A. (1997). Literature Review of Training and Family Day Care. Paper prepared for the Family Day Care Training Project. Ottawa: Canadian Child Care Federation.
4. Clifford, R., Harms, T., Pepper, S., & Stuart, B. (1992). Assessing quality in family day care. In D. L. Peters, & A. R. Pence (Eds.), Family Day Care: Current Research for Informed Public Policy (pp. 243-265). New York: Oxford.
5. Cohen, N., & Modigliani, K. (1990). The Evaluation Report of the Family to Family Project. New York: Families and Work Institute.
6. DeBord, K., & Sawyers, J. (1996). The effects of training on the quality of family child care for those associated with and not associated with professional child care organizations. Child and Youth Care Forum, 25(1), 7-15.
7. Doherty, G. (1997). Multiple Stakeholders, Multiple Perspectives. Paper prepared for the Partners in Quality project. Ottawa: Canadian Child Care Federation.
8. Dombro, A. L., & Modigliani, K. (1995). Providers Speak about Training, Trainers, Accreditation, and Professionalism. New York: Families and Work Institute.
9. Dunster, L., & Taylor, A. (1998). Family Day Care Training Project: Synthesis Report. Ottawa: Canadian Child Care Federation.
10. Eheart, B. K. (1987). Training day care home providers: Implications for policy and research. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 1(2), 119-132.
11. Emlen, A., & Prescott, E. (1992). Future policy and research needs. In D. L. Peters & A. R. Pence (Eds.), Family Day Care: Current Research for Informed Public Policy (pp. 266-278). New York: Oxford.
12. Ferri, E. (1992). What Makes Childminding Work? A Study of Training for Childminders. London: National Children's Bureau.
13. Fosburg, S. (1981). Family Day Care in the United States: Final Report of the National Day Care Home Study, Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
14. Galinsky, E., Howes, C., & Kontos, S. (1994). The Family Day Care Training Study: Highlights of Findings. New York: Families and Work Institute.
15. Goss Gilroy Inc. (1998). Providing Home Child Care for a Living: Surveys of the Regulated and Unregulated Sectors. Ottawa: Canadian Child Care Federation.
16. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Harms, T., & Clifford, R. M. (1989). Family Day Care Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Howes, C. (1983). Caregiver behavior in center and in family day care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4, 99-107.
19. Johnson, L., & Dineen, J. (1981). The Kin Trade. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
20. Kontos, S., Machida, S., Griffin, S., & Read, M. (1992). Training and professionalism in family day care. In D. L. Peters & A. R. Pence (Eds.), Family Day Care: Current Research for Informed Public Policy (pp. 188-207). New York: Oxford.
21. Kontos, S. (1992). Family Day Care: Out of the Shadows and into the Limelight. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
22. Kontos, S., Howes, C., & Galinsky, E. (1996). Does training make a difference to quality in family day care? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(4), 427-445.
23. Kyle, I. (1997a). Private and public discourses: The social context of child care. Canadian Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 6(3), 203-222.
24. Kyle, I. (1997b). Ontario Home Child Care Providers' Reports of their Training and Educational Experiences. Ottawa: Canadian Child Care Federation.
25. Lord, J., & Church, K. (1999). Beyond partnership shock: Getting to yes, living with no. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12(2), 113-121.
26. McKnight, J. (1977). Professionalized service and disabling help. In I. Illich, I. Zola, J. McKnight, J. Caplan, & H. Shaiken, Disabling Professions (pp. 69-92). New York: Marion Boyers.
27. Modigliani, K. (1991). Assessing the Quality of Family Day Care: A Comparison of Five Instruments. Hayward, CA: Mervyn's Public Affairs Office.
28. Moss, P. (1994). Defining quality: Values, stakeholders and processes. In P. Moss & A. Pence (Eds.), Valuing Quality in Early Childhood Services: New Approaches to Defining Quality (pp. 1-9). New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Pence, A., & Goelman, H. (1991). The relationship of regulation, training and motivation to quality of care in family day care. Child and Youth Care Forum, 20(2), 83-101.
30. Pence, A., & Goelman, H. (1987). Who cares for the child in day care? Characteristics of caregivers in three types of daycare. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 315-334.
31. Pollard, J., & Fischer, J. L. (1992). Research perspectives on family day care. In D. L. Peters & A. R. Pence (Eds.), Family Day Care: Current Research for Informed Public Policy (pp. 92-111). New York: Oxford.
32. Powell, D. R., & Bollin, G. (1992). Dimensions of parent-provider relationships in family day care. In D. L. Peters & A. R. Pence (Eds.), Family Day Care: Current Research for Informed Public Policy (pp. 170-187). New York: Oxford.
33. Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1998). Focus group research: Exploration and discovery. In L. Bickman & D. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (pp. 505-526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Taylor, A. (1998, Winter). Providing home child care for a living: Summary of the national surveys. Interactions, 12(4), 21-28.
36. Taylor, A., & Botschner, J. (1998). Evaluation Handbook. Toronto: Ontario Community Support Association.