Philosophical Issues in Doctoral Education in Social Work

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 143-153

  Anastas, Jeane W ^a   Congress, Elaine P ^a  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033472259     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.1999.10778953     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abramson, M. (1996). Toward a more holistic understanding of ethics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 32(4) ,1-14.
2. Allen, P. (1993). The constructivist paradigm: Values and ethics. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30(2), 31-54.
3. Allen-Meares, P., & Lane, B. (1990). Social work practice: Integrating qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques. Social Work, 35, 452-458.
4. Anastas, J. W., & MacDonald, M. L. (1994). Research design for social work and the human services. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bloom, M. (1995). The great philosophy of science war. Social Work Research, 19(1), 19-23.
6. Brekke, J. S. (1986). Scientific imperatives in social work research: Pluralism is not skepticism. Social Service Review, 60(4), 538-554.
7. Carrillo, D., DeWeaver, K., Kilpatrick, A., & Smith, M. (1993). Single system research design content in the doctoral curriculum. Research on Social Work Practice, 3(4), 414-419.
8. Council on Social Work Education. (1992). Curriculum policy statement for baccalaureate and master’s degree programs in social work education. Alexandria, VA: Author.
9. Dean, R. G., & Fenby, B. L. (1989). Exploring epistemologies: Social work action as a reflection of philosophical assumptions. Journal of Social Work Education,25, 46-54.
10. Doelker, R. (1977). Education and values: Does social work education acculturate future professionals? Social Perspectives, 4(2), 1-4.
11. Drisko, J. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity.foumal of Social Work Education, 33,185-197.
12. Fischer, J. (1981). The social work revolution. Social Work, 26(3), 199-207.
13. Fischer, J. (1993). Empirically-based practice: The end of ideology. Journal of Social Service Research, 18(1/2), 19-64.
14. Fraser, M., Jenson, J., & Lewis, R. (1993). Research training in social work: The continuum is not a continuum. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(1), 46-62.
15. Fraser, M., Taylor, M. J., Jackson, R. M., & O’Jack, J. (1991). Social work and science: Many ways of knowing? Social Work, 27(4), 5-15.
16. Gilgun, J., Daly, G., & Handel, G. (Eds.). (1992). Qualitative methods in family research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Goldstein, E. (1996). What is clinical social work? Looking back to move ahead. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(1), 89-104.
18. Gordon, W. (1983). Social work revolution or evolution? Social Work, 28(3), 181-185.
19. Gorman, J. (1993). Postmodernism and the conduct of inquiry in social work. Affilia, 8(3), 247-264.
20. Hartman, A. (1993). Reflection and controversy: Essays on social work. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
21. Heineman, M. (1981). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research. Social Service Review, 55(3), 371-396.
22. Heineman Pieper, M. (1985). The future of social work research. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 21(4), 3-11.
23. Heineman Pieper, M. (1989). The heuristic paradigm: A unifying and comprehensive approach to social work research. Smith College Studies in Social Work,60, 8-34.
24. Holland, T., Austin, D., Allen-Meares, P., & Garvin, C. (1991). A octennium of doctorates. Arete, 16(1), 1-11.
25. Hudson, W. (1982). Scientific imperatives in social work research and practice. Social Service Review, 56(2), 246-258.
26. Imre, R. W. (1985). Tacit knowledge in social work research and practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 55(2), 137-149.
27. Kronick, J., Kamerman, S., & Glisson, C. (1989, October). The structure of doctoral programs in social work: A critical analysis. Paper presented at meeting of the Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education, Gatlinburg, TN.
28. Laird, J. (1993). Revisioning social work education: A social constructionist approach. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 8(1/2), 1-10.
29. Lindsey, E. (1997). Feminist issues in qualitative research with formerly homeless mothers. Affilia, 12(1), 57-75.
30. Meinert, R. (1980). Values in social work called dysfunctional myth. Journal of Social Welfare, 6(3), 5-16.
31. Munson, C. (1996). Should doctoral programs graduate students with fewer than two years of post-MSW experience? No! Journal of Social Work Education, 32,167-172.
32. National Institute of Mental Health. (1991). Building social work knowledge for effective services and policies: A plan for research development. A report of the Task Force on Social Work Research. Washington, DC: Author.
33. Noble, D., & King, J. (1981). Values: Passing on the torch without burning the runner. Social Casework, 62(10), 579-584.
34. O’Reilly, C. (1991). Heresy about the social work clinical doctorate. Clinical Social Work Journal, 79(3), 327-330.
35. Patchner, M. (1982). A decade of social work graduates: Their characteristics and educational programs. Journal of Education for Social Work, 75(2),35-41.
36. Peile, C. (1988). Research paradigms in social work: From stalemate to creative synthesis. Social Service Review, 62(1), 1-19.
37. Proctor, E. (1996). Should doctoral programs graduate students with fewer than two years of post-MSW experience? Yes! Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 161-167.
38. Reamer, F.J. (1993). Philosophical foundations of socialwork. NewYork: Columbia University Press.
39. Rein, M., & White, S. (1981). Knowledge in practice. Social Service Review, 55(1), 1-41.
40. Riessman, C. (Ed.) (1994). Qualitative studies in social work research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Rodwell, M., & Woody, D. (1994). Constructivist evaluation: The policy context. In E. Sherman & W. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 315-327). NewYork: Columbia University Press.
42. Royse, D. (1980). Social work doctoral education programs: A consumer’s eye-view. Journal of Education for Social Work, 76(2), 43-48.
43. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1997). Research methods in social work. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
44. Saleebey, D. (1979). The tension between research and practice: Assumptions of the experimental paradigm. Clinical Social WorkJournal, 7,267-284.
45. Salner, M. (1984). Needed: A human science for research in the helping professions. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 54(2), 85-97.
46. Scott, D. (1990). Practice wisdom: the neglected source of practice research. Social Work, 35, 564-568.
47. Sherman, E., & Reid, W. (Eds.). (1994). Qualitative research in social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
48. Shore, B. (1991). Is there a role for clinical doctoral education? No! Journal of Social Work Education, 27,231-240.
49. Swigonski, M. (1994). The logic of feminist standpoint theory for social work research. Social Work, 39, 387-393.
50. Thyer, B. (1995). Promoting an empiricist agenda in the human services: An ethical and humanistic imperative. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 26, 93-98.
51. Tyson, K. (1992). A new approach to relevant scientific research for practitioners: The heuristic paradigm. Social Work, 38, 541-556.
52. Wakefield, J. (1988a). Psychotherapy, distribu-tivejustice, and social work. Part I: Distributive justice as a framework for social work. Social Service Review, 62(2), 187-210.
53. Wakefield, J. (1988b). Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work. Part II: Psychotherapy and the pursuit of social justice. Social Service Review, 62(3), 353-382.
54. Wakefield, J. (1995). When an irresistable epistemology meets an immovable ontology. Social Work Research, 19(1), 9-17.
55. Wittman, M. (1979). Feast or famine: The future for doctoral education in social work. journal of Education for Social Work, 75(1), 110-115.