Feminist issues in qualitative research with formerly homeless mothers

Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 57-75

  Lindsey, Elizabeth W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031092474     PISSN: 08861099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/088610999701200104     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allen, K. R., & Baber, K. M. (1992). Ethical and epistemological tensions in applying a postmodern perspective to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 1-15.
2. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
4. Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
5. Jayaratne, T. E. (1983). The value of quantitative methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli-Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 140-161). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214-222.
7. LaRossa, R., Bennett, L. A., & Gelles, E. G. (1981). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 303-313.
8. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Lindsey, E. W. (1994/1995). Creating a new home: The process by which mother-headed homeless families become stably rehoused (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(9), 3009-A.
10. Lindsey, E. W. (1996). Mothers' perceptions of factors influencing the process of restabilization among homeless families. Families in Society, 77, 203-215.
11. Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli-Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 117-139). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Peplau, L. A., & Conrad, E. (1989). Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 379-400.
14. Peshkin, A. (1988, October). In search of subjectivity. Educational Researcher, 17, 17-22.
15. Reyes, L. M., & Waxman, L. D. (1989). A status report on hunger and homelessness in America's cities: 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Mayors.
16. Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 21-27.
17. Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America. New York: Basic Books.
18. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
19. Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3-18.