The psychology of assisted reproduction - Or psychology assisting its reproduction? A response

Australian Psychologist

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 211-215

  Daniels, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033445854     PISSN: 00050067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00050069908257456     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Abbey, A., Andrews, F.M., & Halman, L.J. (1991). Gender's role in responses to infertility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 295-316.
2. Adair, V. (1999). Follow-up of IVF families. In R. Jansen & D. Mortimer (Eds.), Towards reproductive certainty (pp. 77-84). New York: Parthenon.
3. Andrews, F.M., Abbey, A., & Halman, L.J. (1992). Is fertility-problem stress different? The dynamics of stress in fertile and infertile couples. Fertility and Sterility, 57, 1247-1253.
4. Austrian National Council. (1992). Federal law on medically assisted procreation. Austria: Author.
5. Baran, A., & Pannor, R. (1993). Lethal secrets: The psychology of donor insemination: Problems and solutions (2nd ed.). New York: Amistad.
6. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Sussex: Harvester.
7. Bok, S. (1982). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Pantheon.
8. Brandon, J., & Warner, J. (1977). AID and adoption: Some comparisons. British Journal of Social Work, 7, 335-341.
9. Bresnick, E., & Taymor, M.L. (1979). The role of counselling in infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 32, 154-156.
10. Broderick, P., & Walker, I. (1995). Information access and donated gametes: How much do we know about who wants to know? Human Reproduction, 10, 3338-3341.
11. Canadian Government. (1997). Bill C47. Ottawa: Author.
12. Connolly, K.J., Edelmann, R.J., & Cooke, I.D. (1987). Distress and marital problems associated with infertility. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 5, 49-57.
13. Connolly, K.J., Edelmann, R.J., Cooke, I.D., & Robson, J. (1992). The impact of infertility on psychological functioning. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36, 459-468.
14. Daniels, K.R. (1987). Semen donors in New Zealand: Their characteristics and attitudes. Clinical Reproduction and Fertility, 5(4),177-190.
15. Daniels, K.R. (1989). Semen donors: Their motivations and attitudes to their offspring. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 7,121-127.
16. Daniels, K.R. (1991). Relationships between semen donors and their networks. Australian Social Work, 44(1), 29-35.
17. Daniels, K.R. (1992). The psychosocial needs of semen donors. In K. Wijma & B.V. Schoultz (Eds.), Reproductive life: Advances in psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology (pp. 563-70). Carnforth: Parthenon.
18. Daniels, K.R. (1993). Infertility counselling: The need for a psychosocial perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 23, 501-155.
19. Daniels, K.R. (1994). Assisted reproductive technology policy in New Zealand: Needs, rights and responsibilities. Public Sector, 17(3), 22-25.
20. Daniels, K.R. (1997). Information sharing in gamete donation. In C. Lorbach (Ed.), Let the offspring speak: Discussions on donor conception (pp. 95-107). Sydney, NSW: Donor Conception Support Group of Australia.
21. Daniels, K.R. (1998). The semen providers. In K. Daniels & E. Haimes (Eds.), Donor insemination: International social science perspectives (pp. 76-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Daniels, K. R. (1999). Protecting the vulnerable in collaborative reproduction. In R. Jansen & D. Mortimer (Eds.), Towards reproductive certainty: Fertility and genetics beyond 1999 (pp. 37-45). New York: Parthenon.
23. Daniels, K.R., Curson, R., & Lewis, G.M. (1996a). Families formed as a result of semen donor insemination: The views of semen donors. Child and Family Social Work, 1, 97-106.
24. Daniels, K.R., Curson, R., & Lewis, G.M. (1996b). Semen donor recruitment: A study of donors in two clinics. Human Reproduction, 11, 746-751.
25. Daniels, K.R., Ericsson, H.-L., & Burn, I.P. (1996). Families and donor insemination: The views of donors. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 5, 229-237.
26. Daniels, K.R., & Lewis, G. (1996). Openness of information in the use of donor gametes: Developments in New Zealand. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 14, 57-68.
27. Daniels, K.R., Lewis, G.M., & Curson, R. (1997). Information sharing in semen donation: The views of donors. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 673-680.
28. Daniels, K.R., & Taylor, K. (1993). Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences, 12, 155-170.
29. Downey, J., Yingling, S., McKinney, M., Husami, N., Jewelewicz, R., & Maidman, J. (1989). Mood disorders, psychiatric symptoms, and distress in women presenting for infertility evaluation. Fertility and Sterility, 52, 425-32.
30. Edelmann, R.J., & Connolly, K.J. (1987). The counselling needs of infertile couples. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 5, 63-70.
31. Edelmann, R., & Cook, R. (1994). Infertility counselling and psychological aspects of infertility: A selected bibliography. York, UK: British Infertility Counselling Association.
32. Haimes, E. (1988). Secrecy: What can artificial reproduction learn from adoption? International Journal of Law and the Family, 2, 46-61.
33. Joyce, D.N. (1984). The implications of greater openness concerning AID. In AID and after: Papers from BAAF, BASW, and a Scottish working party. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
34. Kings Fund Centre Counselling Committee. (1991). Counselling for regulated infertility treatments. London: Author.
35. Klock, S.C. (1993). Psychological evaluation and counselling of gamete recipients. In Course 13 Clinical Assessment and Counselling in Third-Party Reproduction, 26th Annual Postgraduate Course (pp. 51-8). Montreal, Canada: American Fertility Society.
36. Knoppers, B.M., & Le Bris, S. (1991). Recent advances in medically assisted conception: Legal ethical and social issues. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 18, 329-361.
37. National Bioethics Consultative Committee. (1988). Access to information: An analogy between adoption and the use of gamete donation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
38. National Bioethics Consultative Committee. (1991). Reproductive technology counselling. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
39. New Zealand Government. (1998). Assisted human reproduction bill. Wellington: Author.
40. Quail, K.J., Mayne, P., & Cordray, W. (1999). From Sperm donor to offsprng: The path often travelled but rarely discussed: Donor Conception Group Newsletter (NSW, Australia), July, 7-7.
41. Schilling, G. (1995). Zur Problematik familiarer Geheimnisse am Beispiel der heterologen Insemination [Family secrets in donor insemination]. Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychology, 45, 16-23.
42. Snowden, R., Mitchell, G.D., & Snowden, E.M. (1983). Artificial reproduction: A social investigation. London: Allen & Unwin.
43. Swedish government. (1989). 1984 Swedish law on artificial insemination, No. 1140/1984. In United Nations, Convention on the rights of the child (pp. 77-96). New York: United Nations.
44. Victorian Government. (1995). Infertility Treatment Act. Melbourne: Author.
45. Walby, C., & Symons, B. (1990). Who am I? Identity, adoption and human fertilisation. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
46. Walker, I., & Broderick, P. (1999). The psychology of assisted reproduction - or psychology assisting its reproduction? Australian Psychologist, 34, 38-44.
47. Walters, L. (1987). Ethics and new reproductive technologies: An international review of committee statements. Hastings Center Report, 17(3), 3-9.
48. Zoldbrod, A.P., & Covington, S.N. (1999). Recipient counseling for donor insemination. In L.H. Burns & S.N. Covington (Eds.), Infertility counseling (pp. 325-344). New York: Parthenon.