Challenges to the reproduction of misunderstanding

Australian Psychologist

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 221-228

  Walker, Iain ^a   Broderick, Pia ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033435456     PISSN: 00050067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00050069908257460     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baran, A., & Pannor, R. (1989). Lethal secrets. New York: Warner.
2. Blood, J. (1999). Response to Walker and Broderick from the Australian and New Zealand Infertility Counsellors' Association. Australian Psychologist, 34, 209-210.
3. Broderick, P., & Walker, I. (1995). Information access and donated gametes: How much do we know about who wants to know? Human Reproduction, 10, 3338-3341.
4. Burr, V. (1995). Introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
5. Daniels, K.R. (1989). Semen donors: Their motivations and attitudes to their offspring. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 7, 121-127.
6. Daniels, K.R. (1991). Relationships between semen donors and their networks. Australian Social Work, 44, 29-35.
7. Daniels, K.R. (1994). Adoption and donor insemination: Factors influencing couples' choices. Child Welfare League of America, 73, 5-14.
8. Daniels, K.R. (1998). The semen providers. In K.R. Daniels & E. Haimes (Eds.), Donor insemination: International social science perspectives (pp. 76-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Daniels, K.R. (1999). "The Psychology of Assisted Reproduction - or Psychology Assisting its Reproduction?": A Response. Australian Psychologist, 34, 204-208.
10. Daniels, K.R., & Taylor, K. (1993). Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and Life Sciences, 12, 155-170.
11. Humphrey, M., Humphrey, H., & Ainsworth-Smith, I. (1991). Screening couples seeking donor insemination. Social Sciences and Medicine, 32, 273-278.
12. Keeping, D. (1994). The control of reproductive technology: Plenary address. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the Fertility Society of Australia, Brisbane.
13. Lorbach, C., & Lorbach, P. (1999). Comment on Walker and Broderick. Australian Psychologist, 34, 211-212.
14. Mills, C.W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Quail, K.J., Mayne, P., & Cordray, W. (1999, 9-14 May). From sperm donor to offspring: The path often travelled but rarely discussed. Paper presented at the 11th World Congress on IVF and Human Reproduction Genetics, Sydney.
16. Rose, J. (1999). The response of an adult donor insemination offspring to the article "The Psychology of Assisted Reproduction - or Psychology Assisting its Reproduction?". Australian Psychologist, 34, 213.
17. Select Committee on the Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991. (1999). Report. Perth, WA: Parliament of Western Australia.
18. Tyler, J.P.P., Nicholas, M.K., Crockett, N.G., & Driscoll, G. (1983). Some attitudes to artificial insemination by donor. Clinical Reproduction and Fertility, 2, 151-160.
19. Walker, I., & Broderick, P. (1999a). Donor gametes and embryos: Who wants to know what about whom, and why? Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Walker, I., & Broderick, P. (1999b). The psychology of assisted reproduction - or psychology assisting its reproduction? Australian Psychologist, 34, 38-14.
21. Western Australian Reproductive Technology Council. (1997). Annual Report, July 1 1996 - June 30 1997. Perth, WA: Author.
22. Western Australian Reproductive Technology Council. (1998). Questions and answers about the donation of human reproductive material. Perth, WA: Author.