The status and role of vaccines in the U.S. food animal industry. Implications for biological terrorism

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 894, Issue , 1999, Pages 206-217

  Nara, Peter L ^a  

^a Biological Mimetics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VACCINE;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL DISEASE; BIOLOGICAL WARFARE; BIRD DISEASE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; INFECTION; NONHUMAN; SWINE DISEASE; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALIA; AVES; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0033427056     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08066.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. 1. Committee on Foreign Animal Diseases of the United States Animal Health Association. 1992. Foreign Animal Diseases. U.S. Animal Health Association. Richmond, VA.
2. 2. Gordon, J.C. & S. Bech-Nielsen. 1986. Biological Terrorism: A direct threat to our livestock industry. Mil. Med. 151: 357-363.
3. 3. Watson, W.A. 1986. Animal Health Today - Problems of large livestock units. Large livestock units and notifiable disease. Brit.Vet. J. 136(1): 1-20.
4. 4. Report to Congress on the Extent and Effects of Domestic and International Terrorism in Animal Enterprises. 1993. Physiologist 36(6): 207-259.
5. 5. Veterinary Biologics Notice No. 65. Biological Products in Licensed Establishments Produced and Destroyed 01/01/97 through 12/31/97. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Biotechnology, Biologics and Environmental Protection. Hyattsville, MD. pp. 1-35.
6. 6. Webster, R.G. 1997. Influenza virus: transmission between species and relevance to emergence of the next human pandemic. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 13: 105-113
7. 7. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1978. Eradication of Exotic Newcastle Disease in Southern California. 1971-74. Veterinary Services. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
8. 8. Doel, T.R. 1996. Natural and vaccine-induced immunity to foot and mouth disease: the prospects for improved vaccines. Rev. Sci. Tech. Epiz. 15(3): 883-911.
9. 9. Garrity, R.R., G. Rimmelzwaan, A. Minassian, W.P. Tsai, G. Lin, J.J. de Jong, J. Goudsmit & P.L. Nara. 1997 Refocusing neutralizing antibody response by targeted dampening of an immunodominant epitope. J. Immunol. 159(1): 279-289.
10. 10. Barett, T. 1996. Morbilliviruses in the twenty-first century. In Proceedings of the FAO Technical Consultation on the Global Rinderpest Eradication Programme held in Rome. pp. 25-38.
11. 11. Dahle, J. & B. Liess. 1992. A review on classical swine fever infections in pigs: epizootiology, clinical disease and pathology. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15(3): 203-211.
12. 12. Martins, C.L. & A.C. Leitao. 1994. Porcine immune responses to African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 43(1-3): 99-106.
13. 13. Moennig, V. 1992. The hog cholera virus. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15(3): 189-201.