Welfare-domination under preference-replacement: A survey and open questions

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 373-394

  Thomson, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033422771     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003550050150     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Aragones E (1995) A derivation of the money Rawlsian solution. Soc Choice Welfare 12: 267-276
2. Alkan A (1994) Monotonicity and envyfree assignments. Econ Theory 4: 605-616
3. Alkan A, Demange G, Gale D (1991) Fair allocation of indivisible objects and criteria of justice. Econometrica 59: 1023-1039
4. Barberà S, Jackson M (1994) A characterization of strategy-proof social choice functions for economies with public goods. Soc Choice Welfare 11: 241-252
5. Barberà S, Jackson M, Neme A (1997) Strategy-proof allotment rules. Games Econ Behavior 18: 1-21
6. Benassy JP (1982) The Economics of Market Disequilibrium. Academic Press, New York
7. Berliant M, Dunz K, Thomson W (1992) On the fair division of a heterogeneous commodity. J Math Econ 21: 201-216
8. Bevia C (1993) Fair allocation in a general model with indivisible goods. University of Alicante mimeo, December
9. Bevia C (1996) The identical preferences lower bound solution and consistency in economies with indivisible goods. Soc Choice Welfare 13: 113-126
10. Ching S (1992a) A simple characterization of the uniform rule. Econ Lett 40: 57-60
11. Ching S (1992b) Strategy-proofness and median voters. University of Rochester mimeo, December
12. Ching S (1994) An alternative characterization of the uniform rule. Soc Choice Welfare 11: 131-136
13. Ching S, Thomson W (1992) Population-monotonic solutions in public good economies with single-peaked preferences. University of Rochester mimeo, Discussion Paper
14. Chun Y (1986) The solidarity axiom for quasi-linear social choice problems. Soc Choice Welfare 3: 297-320
15. Chun Y, Thomson W (1988) Monotonicity properties of bargaining solutions when applied to economics. Math Soc Sci 15: 11-27
16. Fleurbaey M (1996) Reward patterns of fair division. Rev Econ Studies 59: 365-395
17. Foley D (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7: 45-98
18. Kalai E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45: 1623-1630
19. Kihlstrom RE, Roth AE, Schmeidler D (1980) Risk aversion and solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. In: Moeschlin O, Pallaschke D (eds) Game Theory and Mathematical Economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 65-71
20. Klaus B (1997) The role of replication-invariance: two answers concerning the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. University of Rochester mimeo, May
21. Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1996) Strategy-proof division of a private good and convex utility. University of Maastricht mimeo, 1966
22. Maskin E (1987) On the fair allocation of indivisible goods. In: G. Feiwel (ed) Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. Macmillan, London
23. Miyagawa E (1997) Replacement-domination for the provision of multiple public goods as options. University of Rochester mimeo, December
24. Moulin H (1980) On strategy-proofness and single-peakedness. Pub Choice 35: 437-455
25. Moulin H (1984) Generalized Condorcet-winners for single-peaked preferences and single-plateau preferences. Soc Choice Welfare 1: 127-147
26. Moulin H (1987) The pure compensation problem: egalitarianism versus laissez-fairism. Qu J Econ 101: 769-783
27. Moulin H (1990) Fair division under joint ownership: recent results and open questions. Soc Choice Welfare 7: 149-170
28. Pazner E and Schmeidler D (1978) Egalitarian-equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Qu J Econ 92: 671-687
29. Roemer J (1986) Equality of resources implies equality of welfare. Qu J Econ 101: 751-784
30. Schmeidler D, Vind K (1972) Fair net trades. Econometrica 40: 637-642
31. Sprumont Y (1991) The division problem with single-peaked preferences: A characterization of the uniform rule. Econometrica 59: 509-519
32. Sprumont Y (1996) Axiomatizing ordinal welfare egalitarianism when preferences may vary. J Econ Theory 68: 77-110
33. Sprumont Y (1998) Equal factor equivalence in economies with multiple public goods. University of Montreal mimeo. Soc Choice Welfare 15: 543-558
34. Sprumont Y, Zhou L, (1995) Pazner-Schmeidler rules in large societies. University of Montreal mimeo, September
35. Stromquist N (1980) How to cut a cake fairly. Amer Math Monthly 87: 640-644
36. Svensson LG (1983) Large indivisibles: an analysis with respect to price equilibrium, and fairness. Econometrica 51: 939-954
37. Tadenuma K, Thomson W (1991) No-envy and consistency in economies with indivisible goods. Econometrica 59: 1755-1767
38. Tadenuma K, Thomson W (1993) The fair allocation of an indivisible good when monetary compensations are possible. Math Soc Sci 25: 117-132
39. Tadenuma K, Thomson W (1995) Refinements of the no-envy solution in economies with indivisible goods. Theory Decision 39: 189-206
40. Thomson W (1980) Two characterizations of the Raiffa solution. Econ Lett 6: 225-231
41. Thomson W (1983) The fair division of a fixed supply among a growing population. Math Oper Res 8: 319-326
42. Thomson W (1990) A replacement principle. University of Rochester mimeo
43. Thomson W (1993) The replacement principle in public good economies with single-peaked preferences. Econ Lett 42: 31-36
44. Thomson W (1994a) Resource-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Soc Choice Welfare 11: 205-223
45. Thomson W (1994b) Consistent solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. J Econ Theory 63: 219-245
46. Thomson W (1994c) Notions of equal, or equivalent, opportunities. Soc Choice Welfare 11: 137-156
47. Thomson W (1995a) Population-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Econ Theory 5: 229-246
48. Thomson W (1995b) Population-monotonic allocation rules. In: Barrett W, Moulin H, Salles M, Schofield N (eds) Social Choice, Welfare, and Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 79-124
49. Thomson W (1996a) The replacement principle in economies with private goods. University of Rochester mimeo
50. Thomson W (1996b) The fair division of time. University of Rochester, mimeo
51. Thomson W (1997a) The replacement principle in private good economies with single-peaked preferences. J Econ Theory 76: 145-168
52. Thomson W (1997b) Fair allocation rules. University of Rochester, mimeo
53. Thomson W (1998) The replacement principle in economies with indivisible goods. Soc Choice Welfare 15: 57-66
54. Thomson W, Myerson RB (1980) Monotonicity and independence axioms. Int J Game Theory 9: 37-49
55. Vohra R (1997) The replacement principle and tree structured preferences. Ohio State University mimeo