Has ecosystem management really changed practices on the National Forests?

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 40-45

  Phillips, Claudia Goetz ^a   Randolph, John ^b  

^a MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST PLANNING; GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT; NATIONAL FOREST;

USA;

EID: 0031706120     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. JONES, J.R. 1993. Social conflict: The heart and soul of New Perspectives. In The many faces of New Perspectives: Strategies in natural resource management, eds. J.R. Jones and E.T. Bartlett, 7-12. Report Number 101. Fort Collins: Colorado State University, College of Natural Resources.
2. JONES, J.R., R. MARTIN, and E.T. BARTLETT. 1995. Ecosystem management: The US Forest Service's response to social conflict. Society and Natural Resources 8(2):161-68.
3. KEITER, R.B. 1988. Natural ecosystem management in parks and wilderness areas: Looking at the law. In Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness, eds. J.K. Agee and D.R. Johnson, 15-40. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
4. KENNEDY, A.J. 1992. Towards a focused environmental assessment process: A new approach to impact scoping for environmental assessments. PhD dissertation, University of Calgary.
5. KENNEDY, J.J., and T.M. QUIGLEY. 1994. Evolution of Forest Service organizational culture and adaptation issues in embracing ecosystem management. In Eastside forest ecosystem health assessment, volume II: Ecosystem management: Principles and applications, eds. M.E. Jensen and P.S. Bourgeron, 16-26. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-318. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
6. LUCIER, A.A. 1994. Criteria for success in managing forested landscapes. Journal of Forestry 92(7):20-24.
7. PHILLIPS, C.G. 1997. An evaluation of ecosystem management and its application to the National Environmental Policy Act: The case of the US Forest Service. PhD dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
8. SALWASSER, H. 1992a. The challenge of New Perspectives. In Rocky Mountain New Perspectives: Proceedings of a regional workshop, eds. E.T. Bartlett and J.R. Jones. General Technical Report RM-220. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
9. 1992b. From New Perspectives to ecosystem management: Response to Frissell et al. and Lawrence and Murphy. Conservation Biology 6(3):469-72.
10. SALWASSER, H., and R.D. PFISTER. 1994. Ecosystem management: From theory to practice. In Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management, 150-61. General Technical Report RM-247. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
11. STAEBLER, R.N. 1994. Ecosystem management: An evolving process. Journal of Forestry 92(8):5.
12. SWANSON, F.J., and D. BERG. 1991. The ecological roots of new approaches to forestry. Forest Perspectives 1(3):6-8.
13. THOMAS, J.W. 1996. Forest Service perspective on ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6(3):703-5.
14. USDA Forest Service (USDA-FS). 1985. Final environmental impact statement and final forest plan: Land and resource management plan for the Francis Marion National Forest. Atlanta: USDA Forest Service, Southern Region.
15. 1986. Final environmental impact statement and final forest plan: Land and resource management plan for the George Washington National Forest. Atlanta: USDA Forest Service, Southern Region.
16. 1987. Final environmental impact statement for the land and resource management plan for the national forests and grasslands in Texas. Atlanta: USDA Forest Service, Southern Region.
17. 1992. Ecosystem management of the national forests and grasslands. Memorandum 1330-1. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.
18. 1993. Final environmental impact statement and final forest plan: Land and resource management plan for the George Washington National Forest. Atlanta: USDA Forest Service, Southern Region.
19. 1996a. Revised final environmental impact statement and revised final forest plan: Land and resource management plan for the Francis Marion National Forest. Atlanta: USDA Forest Service, Southern Region.
20. 1996b. Final environmental impact statement for the revised land and resource management plan for the national forests and grasslands in Texas. Atlanta: USDA Forest Service, Southern Region.
21. 1997. Forest Service decisionmaking system: Overview of forest planning and project level decisionmaking. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.