Media coverage of the child B case

British Medical Journal

Volumn 312, Issue 7046, 1996, Pages 1587-1591

  Entwistle, Vikki A ^a   Watt, Ian S ^a   Bradbury, Richard ^a   Pehl, Lesley J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION; LAW SUIT; LEUKEMIA; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 0029996896     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1587     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Sheldon TA, Maynard A. Is rationing inevitable? In: Rationing in action. London: BMJ Publishing, 1993:3-14.
2. Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Bradbury R, Pehl LJ. How did the media cover the child B case? In: Marinker M, ed. Controversies in health care policies: 2. London: BMJ Publishing (in press).
3. Weighing health costs. Daily Telegraph 1995 March 13:20.
4. Care in the courts. Times 1995 March 11:17.
5. Prayers for the dying. Daily Express 1995 March 11:8.
6. Stuttaford T. Success of earlier treatment makes for poorer prognosis. The Times 1995 March 13:3.
7. Weale S. Dying girl is denied treatment. Guardian 1995 March 10:1.
8. Palmer J. Final hurdle for cancer experts. Daily Mirror 1995 March 13:4.
9. NHS Executive. Priorities and planning guidance 1996/97. London: NHS Executive, 1995.
10. Allen D. Did they let our little angel die too? News of the World 1995 March 12:20-1.
11. Le Fanu J. Who'll have the last word? Daily Telegraph; 1995 March 11:23.
12. Entwistle V. Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers. BMJ 1995;310:920-3.
13. Smith R. Rationing: the debate we need to have. BMJ 1995;310:686.