Rationing policies on access to in vitro fertilisation in the National Health Service, UK

Reproductive Health Matters

Volumn 7, Issue 14, 1999, Pages 60-70

  Plomer, Aurora ^a   Smith, Iain ^b   Martin Clement, Norma ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0033400728     PISSN: 09688080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90007-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gunning J, English V, 1993. Human In-Vitro Fertilization, Dartmouth.
2. College of Health, 1992.First Report of the National Survey of the Funding and Provision of Infertility Services. College of Health, London.
3. Stone V, Riesel J, 1997. Report of the Fifth National Survey of the funding and Provision of Infertility Services. College of Health, London.
4. Klein R, Day P, Redmaynes, 1996. Managing Scarcity: Priority setting and rationing in the NHS. Open University Press, Buckingham.
5. White Paper, 1944. A National Health Service, Cmd. 6502. HMSO, London.
6. Calabresi, G, Bobbitt P, 1978. Tragic Choices. Norton and Company, New York.
7. NHS Management Executive, 1994. Managing the New NHS: Functions and Responsibilities in the New NHS. NHS Executive, Leeds.
8. NHS Management Executive, Department of Health, 1995. Statement of Responsibilities and Accountabilities. Department of Health, London.
9. NHS Executive, 1996. Promoting Clinical Effectiveness: a Framework for Action in and through the NHS. NHS Executive, Leeds.
10. NHS Management Executive, 1992. Local Voices: involving the local community in purchasing decisions. NHS Executive, Leeds.
11. Redmayne S, Klein R, 1993. Rationing in practice:the case of in vitro fertilisation. British Medical Journal 306:1521-4.
12. Gray SF, Bevan G & Frankel S, 1997. Purchasing Evidence: the corollary of evidence-based purchasing, Journal of Public Health Medicine. 19(1):6-10.
13. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, 1995. Fourth Annual Report, Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, London.
14. Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W, 1996. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet. Nov 23;348 (9039)1394. Also reported in HFEA, 1997. Sixth Annual Report. HFEA, London.
15. Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W, 1996. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet. Nov 23;348 (9039)1394. Also reported in HFEA, 1997. Sixth Annual Report. HFEA, London.
16. The following give an insight into the range and breadth of the political and ethical debate on rationing in the NHS at the time the survey was conducted: House of Commons Health Committee, 1995. ist report (session 1994-5): Priority setting in the NHS: purchasing. HC 134-1. HMSO, London. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, British Medical Association, National Association of Heath Authorities and Trusts, NHS Executive, 1996. Priority Setting in the NHS: a discussion document. South East Insitute of Public Health, Tunbridge Wells. Royal College of Physicians of London, 1995. Setting priorities in the NHS. Royal College of Physicians of London, London. British Medical Assocation Health Policy and Economic Research Unit, 1995. Rationing revisited: a discussion paper. Discussion Paper No 4. BMA, London.
17. The following give an insight into the range and breadth of the political and ethical debate on rationing in the NHS at the time the survey was conducted: House of Commons Health Committee, 1995. ist report (session 1994-5): Priority setting in the NHS: purchasing. HC 134-1. HMSO, London. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, British Medical Association, National Association of Heath Authorities and Trusts, NHS Executive, 1996. Priority Setting in the NHS: a discussion document. South East Insitute of Public Health, Tunbridge Wells. Royal College of Physicians of London, 1995. Setting priorities in the NHS. Royal College of Physicians of London, London. British Medical Assocation Health Policy and Economic Research Unit, 1995. Rationing revisited: a discussion paper. Discussion Paper No 4. BMA, London.
18. The following give an insight into the range and breadth of the political and ethical debate on rationing in the NHS at the time the survey was conducted: House of Commons Health Committee, 1995. ist report (session 1994-5): Priority setting in the NHS: purchasing. HC 134-1. HMSO, London. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, British Medical Association, National Association of Heath Authorities and Trusts, NHS Executive, 1996. Priority Setting in the NHS: a discussion document. South East Insitute of Public Health, Tunbridge Wells. Royal College of Physicians of London, 1995. Setting priorities in the NHS. Royal College of Physicians of London, London. British Medical Assocation Health Policy and Economic Research Unit, 1995. Rationing revisited: a discussion paper. Discussion Paper No 4. BMA, London.
19. The following give an insight into the range and breadth of the political and ethical debate on rationing in the NHS at the time the survey was conducted: House of Commons Health Committee, 1995. ist report (session 1994-5): Priority setting in the NHS: purchasing. HC 134-1. HMSO, London. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, British Medical Association, National Association of Heath Authorities and Trusts, NHS Executive, 1996. Priority Setting in the NHS: a discussion document. South East Insitute of Public Health, Tunbridge Wells. Royal College of Physicians of London, 1995. Setting priorities in the NHS. Royal College of Physicians of London, London. British Medical Assocation Health Policy and Economic Research Unit, 1995. Rationing revisited: a discussion paper. Discussion Paper No 4. BMA, London.
20. Strosberg MA (ed), 1992. Rationing America's Medical Care: the Oregon Plan and Beyond. Brookings Institution. Washington, DC.
21. Hadorn D, 1991. Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregon. Journal of the American Medical Association. 265:2218-25.
22. Williams A, 1985. The economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal 291:326 and Maynard A, 1987. Logic in medicine. British Medical Journal 295:1537.
23. Williams A, 1985. The economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal 291:326 and Maynard A, 1987. Logic in medicine. British Medical Journal 295:1537.
24. Crisp R, 1991. QUALYs and the mentally handicapped. Bulletin of Medical Ethics. April, 13-16.
25. Harris J, 1987. QUALYfying the value of life. Journal of Medical Ethics. 13:117-123.
26. Hunter D, 1997. Desperately Seeking Solutions. Longman, London.
27. HC Debs Vol. 174 21st June 1990, Col 1021. Section 13(5) of the Act.
28. Douglas G. Assisted Reproduction and the Welfare of the Child. Current Legal Problems. 46:53-74. The survey of clinics conducted by Douglas in 1993 revealed that the aims of those who sought to exclude single women appeared to have succeeded in practice, as clinicians offering IVF treatment tended to restrict treatment to heterosexual couples in a stable relationship. - See also: Millns S, 1995. Making 'social judgements that go beyond the purely medical': The reproductive revolution and access to fertility treatment services. In: J Bridgman, S Millns (eds). Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body. Dartmouth Publishing Co, Aldershot.
29. Douglas G. Assisted Reproduction and the Welfare of the Child. Current Legal Problems. 46:53-74. The survey of clinics conducted by Douglas in 1993 revealed that the aims of those who sought to exclude single women appeared to have succeeded in practice, as clinicians offering IVF treatment tended to restrict treatment to heterosexual couples in a stable relationship. - See also: Millns S, 1995. Making 'social judgements that go beyond the purely medical': The reproductive revolution and access to fertility treatment services. In: J Bridgman, S Millns (eds). Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body. Dartmouth Publishing Co, Aldershot.
30. Newdick C, 1995. Who Should We Treat? Clarendon Press, Oxford.
31. Lord Donaldson M.R. in R v. Secretary of State for Social Services, ex-parte Walker (1992) 3 BMLR 32.
32. In R v Sheffield Health Authority, ex-parte Seale (17 October 1994, transcript).