A real-time combination method for the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models;Un méthode de combinaison en temps réel des résultats de différents modèles pluie-débit

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 895-912

  Shamseldin, A Y ^a   O'Connor, K M ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; RAIN; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVERS; RUNOFF; STREAM FLOW; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; WATERSHEDS; WEATHER FORECASTING;

CATCHMENTS; LINEAR PERTURBATION MODEL (LMP); LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LINEAR TRANSFER FUNCTION MODEL (LTFM); LINEARLY-VARYING VARIABLE GAIN FACTOR MODEL (LVGFM); MULTIPLE INPUT SINGLE OUTPUT SYSTEMS; REAL-TIME MODEL OUTPUT COMBINATION METHOD (RTMOCM); SOIL MOISTURE ACCOUNTING AND ROUTING (SMAR) PROCEDURE; WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD (WAM);

HYDROLOGY;

FORECASTING METHOD; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RIVER FLOW;

EID: 0033393056     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626669909492288     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O'Connell, P. E., and Rasmussen, J., 1986a. An introduction to European Hydrological System—Système Hydrologique Européen, “SHE”, 1:History and philosophy of a physically-based distributed, modelling system. J. Hydrol., 87:45–59.
2. Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O'Connell, P. E., and Rasmussen, J., 1986b. An introduction to European Hydrological System—Système Hydrologique Européen, “SHE”, 2:Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol., 87:61–77.
3. Abdelrahman, E. A., 1995. Real-time streamflow forecasting for single-input single-output systems. MSc Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
4. Ahmed, A. E. N., 1998. Flood forecast combination using neural networks and weighted average method. MSc Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
5. Ahsan, M., and O'Connor, K. M., 1994. A simple non-linear rainfall-runoff model with a variable gain factor. J. Hydrol., 155:151–183.
6. Armstrong, J. S., 1989. Combining forecasts:the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end?. Int. J. Forecasting, 5:585–588.
7. ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models of the Watershed Management Committee. Irrigation and Drainage Division. 1993. Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. J. Irrig. Drain. Engng. ASCE, 119 (3):429–442.
8. Batchelor, R., and Dua, P., 1995. Forecaster diversity and benefits of combining forecasts. Manage. Sci., 41 (1):68–75.
9. Bates, J. M., and Granger, C. W. J., 1969. The combination of forecasts. Operational Res. Quart., 20:451–468.
10. Becker, A., and Serban, P., 1990. Hydrological models for water-resources system design and operation. Operational Hydrol. Report no. 34, WMO no. 740 Geneva, Switzerland:World Meteorological Organization.
11. Beven, K., 1997. TOPMODEL:a critique. Hydrol. Processes, 11:1609–1085.
12. Beven, K., and Kirkby, M. J., 1979. A physically based variable contributing area model of catchment hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24 (1):43–69.
13. Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M., 1976. Time Series Analysis:Forecasting and Control. California, USA:Holden-Day. San Francisco.
14. Clemen, R. T., 1989. Combining forecasts:a review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Forecasting, 5:559–83.
15. Clemen, R. T., Murphy, A. H., and Winkler, R. L., 1995. Screening probability forecasts:contrasts between choosing and combining. Int. J. Forecasting, 11:133–146.
16. Dawdy, D. R., and O'Donnell, T., 1965. Mathematical models of catchment behaviour. J. Hydrol. Div. Proc. ASCE, 91:123–137. (HY4)
17. Dickinson, J. P., 1973. Some statistical results in the combination of forecasts. Operational Res. Quart., 24 (2):253–260.
18. Dickinson, J. P., 1975. Some comments on the combination of forecasts. Operational Res. Quart., 26 (1):205–210.
19. Franchini, M., and Pacciani, M., 1991. Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models. J. Hydrol., 122:161–219.
20. Galeati, G., 1990. A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for runoff forecasting. Hydrol. Sci. J., 35 (1):79–94.
21. Granger, C. W. J., and Ramanathan, R., 1984. Improved methods of combing forecasts. J. Forecasting, 3:197–204.
22. Grayson, R. B., Moore, I. D., and McMahon, T. A., 1992. Physically based hydrologic modelling, 2:is the concept realistic?. Wat. Resour. Res., 28 (10):2659–2665.
23. Kachroo, R. K., 1992. River flow forecasting. Part 5. Applications of a conceptual model. J. Hydrol., 133:141–178.
24. Kachroo, R. K., and Liang, G. C., 1992. River flow forecasting. Part 2. Algebraic development of linear modelling techniques. J. Hydrol., 133:17–40.
25. Kachroo, R. K., Liang, G. C., and O'Connor, K. M., 1988. Application of the linear perturbation model (LPM) to flood routing on the Mekong River. Hydrol. Sci. J., 33 (2):193–214.
26. Kachroo, R. K., Sea, C. H., Warsi, M. S., Jemenez, H., and Saxena, R. P., 1992. River flow forecasting. Part 3. Applications of linear techniques in modelling rainfall-runoff transformations. J. Hydrol., 133:41–97.
27. Khan, H., 1986. Conceptual modelling of rainfall-runoff systems. Galway, Ireland.:MEng Thesis, National University of Ireland.
28. Liang, G. C., 1992. A note on the revised SMAR model. Galway, Ireland.:Dept of Engng Hydrology, National University College of Ireland. Unpublished report
29. Liang, G. C., and Guo, Y. F., 1994. Observed seasonal hydrological behaviour used in flow forecasting on the Yangtze River above Hankou. J. Hydrol., 154:383–402.
30. Liang, G. C., and Nash, J. E., 1988. Linear models for river flow routing on large catchments. J. Hydrol., 103:157–188.
31. Liang, G. C., O'Connor, K. M., and Kachroo, R., 1994. A multiple-input single-output variable gain factor model. J. Hydrol., 155:185–198.
32. Loague, K. M., and Freeze, R. A., 1985. A comparison of rainfall-runoff modelling techniques on small upland catchment. Wat. Resour. Res., 21 (2):229–249.
33. Michaud, J., and Sorooshian, S., 1994. Comparison of simple versus complex distributed models on mid-sized semiarid watersheds. Wat. Resour. Res., 30 (3):539–605.
34. Moore, R. J., 1985. The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales. Hydrol. Sci. J., 30 (2):273–297.
35. Moore, R. J., 1986. “ Advances in real-time forecasting practice. Invited paper ”. In Symposium on Flood Warning Systems (Winter Meeting of the River Engineering Section, The Institution of Water Engineers and Scientists). London.:Institution of Water Engineers and Scientists.
36. Naef, F., 1981. Can we model the rainfall-runoff process today?. Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 26 (3):281–289.
37. Nash, J. E., and Barsi, B. I., 1983. A hybrid model for flow forecasting on large catchments. J. Hydrol., 65:125–137.
38. Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10:282–290.
39. Newbold, P., and Granger, C. W. J., 1974. Experience with forecasting univariate time series and the combination of forecasts. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. A., 137 (2):131–146.
40. O'Connell, P. E., and Clarke, R. T., 1981. Adaptive hydrological forecasting- a review. Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 26 (2):179–205.
41. O'Connell, P. E., Nash, J, and Farrell, J. P., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 2. The Brosna catchment at Ferbane. J. Hydrol., 10:317–329.
42. Pectanonchai, B., 1995. A modification of the AR model for updating of model forecasts. Unpublished Report for the Sixth Int. Advance Course/Workshop on River Flow Forecasting (24 April-30 June 1995 Galway).:Dept of Engng Hydrol., National University of Ireland.
43. Serban, P., and Askew, A. J., 1991. Hydrological forecasting and updating procedures., (Proc. Vienna Symp., August 1991) Edited by:Van de Ven, F. H. M., Gutknecht, G., Loucks, D. P., and Salewicz, K. A., 357–369. In:Hydrology for the Water Management of Large River Basins(ed. by IAHS Publ. no. 201
44. Shamseldin, A. Y., O'Connor, K. M., and Liang, G. C., 1997. Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models. J. Hydrol., 197:203–229.
45. Shamseldin, A. Y., and O'Connor, K. M., 1996. A nearest neighbours linear perturbation model for river flow forecasting. J. Hydrol., 179:353–375.
46. Shamseldin, A. Y., 1992. Studies on conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling. MSc Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
47. Shamseldin, A. Y., 1996. Fundamental studies in rainfall-runoff modelling. PhD Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
48. Suebjakla, W., 1996. Modification of the autoregressive (AR) error updating model for real-time streamflow forecasting. MSc Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
49. Tan, B. Q., and O'Connor, K. M., 1996. Application of an empirical infiltration equation in the SMAR model conceptual model. J. Hydrol., 185:275–295.
50. Tan, B. Q., O'Connor, K. M., and Liu, Z. C., 1996. “ Application of a distributed form of the SMAR model. ”. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Water Resources and Environment Research Vol. 1, (Kyoto, Japan, 29–31 October), 45–52. Water Resources Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
51. Thompson, P. D., 1977. How to improve accuracy by combining independent forecasts. Mon. Weath. Rev., 105:228–229.
52. Wilcox, B. P., Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Wight, J. R., 1990. Predicting runoff from rangeland catchment. A comparison of two models. Wat. Resour. Res., 26 (10):2401–2410.
53. Winkler, R. L., 1989. Combining forecasts:A philosophical basis and some current issues. Int. J. Forecasting, 5:605–609.
54. Woolhiser, D. A., 1996. Search for physically based runoff model—a hydrologic El Dorado?. J. Hydraul Engng ASCE, 122 (3):122–129.
55. WMO (World Meteorological Organization. 1975. Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrological forecasting. Operational Hydrology Report no. 7, WMO no. 429. Geneva, Switzerland:WMO.
56. WMO (World Meteorological Organization. 1986. Intercomparsion of models of snowmelt runoff. Operational Hydrology Report no. 23, WMO no. 646. Geneva, Switzerland:WMO.
57. WMO (World Meteorological Organization. 1992. Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models. Operational Hydrology Report no. 38, WMO no. 779. Geneva, Switzerland:WMO.
58. WMO (World Meteorological Organization. 1994. Guide to Hydrological Practices. WMO no. 168 Geneva, Switzerland:WMO.
59. Ye, W., Bates, B. C., Viney, R., Sivapalan, M., and Jakeman, A. J., 1997. Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchments. Wat. Resour. Res., 33 (1):153–166.
60. Zhang, J. Y., O'Connor, K. M., and Liang, G. C., 1994. A software package for river flow forecasting. Hydraulic Engineering Software,1. Water resources and distribution Edited by:Blain, W. R., and Katsifarakis, K. L., 163–170. Southampton, UK:Computational Mechanics Publications.