A nearest neighbour linear perturbation model for river flow forecasting

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 179, Issue 1-4, 1996, Pages 353-375

  Shamseldin, Asaad Y ^a   O'Connor, Kieran M ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW; FORECASTING; NEAREST NEIGHBOUR METHOD; RIVERS;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; RIVERS; WATERSHEDS;

NEAREST NEIGHBOR LINEAR PERTURBATION MODEL; NONPARAMETRIC NEAREST NEIGHBOR METHOD;

STREAM FLOW;

EID: 0030131272     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02833-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ahsan, M. and O'Connor, K.M., 1994. A simple non-linear rainfall-runoff model with a variable gain factor. J. Hydrol., 155: 151-183.
2. Andrews, H.C., 1972. Introduction to Mathematical Techniques in Pattern Recognition. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
3. Galeati, G., 1990. A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for runoff forecasting. Hydrol. Sci. J., 35(1): 79-94.
4. Kachroo, R.K. and Liang, G.C., 1992. River flow forecasting. Part 2. Algebraic development of linear modelling techniques. J. Hydrol., 133: 17-40.
5. Kachroo, R.K., Liang, G.C. and O'Connor, K.M., 1988. Application of the linear perturbation model (LPM) to flood routing on the Mekong River. Hydrol. Sci. J., 33(2): 193-214.
6. Kachroo, R.K., Sea, C.H., Warsi, M.S., Jemenez, H. and Saxena, R.P., 1992. River flow forecasting. Part 3. Applications of linear techniques in modelling rainfall-runoff transformations. J. Hydrol., 133: 41-97.
7. Kanal L., 1974. Patterns in pattern recognition. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, IT-20: 697-722.
8. Karlsson, M. and Yakowitz, S., 1987. Nearest neighbour methods for non-parametric rainfall runoff forecasting. Water Resour. Res., 23(7): 1300-1308.
9. Liang, G.C., 1993. Results obtained for the intercomparison study of mathematical models for river flow forecasting. Unpublished internal report, Dept. of Eng. Hydrology, University College Galway.
10. Liang, G.C. and Nash, J.E., 1988. Linear models for river flow routing on large catchments. J. Hydrol., 103: 157-188.
11. Nash, J.E., 1957. The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. IASH Publ., 45(3): 114-118.
12. Nash, J.E. and Barsi, B.I., 1983. A hybrid model for flow forecasting on large catchments. J. Hydrol., 65: 125-137.
13. Nash, J.E. and Foley, J.J., 1982. Linear models of rainfall-runoff systems. In: V.P. Singh (Editor), Rainfall-Runoff Relationship, Proc. Int. Symp. on Rainfall-Runoff Modelling, Mississippi State University, May 1981. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 51-66.
14. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10: 282-290.
15. Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., 1965. A simplex method for function optimization. Comput. J., 7: 308.
16. Panu, U.S. and Unny, T.E., 1979. Application of feature prediction model in hydrologic time series synthesis. In: A.E. McBean, K.W. Hipel and T.E. Unny (Editors), Inputs for Risk Analysis in Water Systems. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 315-338.
17. Yakowitz, S., 1987. Nearest neighbour methods for time series analysis. J. Time Ser. Anal., 8(2): 235-247.