Comparing several genetic algorithm schemes for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models;Comparaison entre plusieurs systèmes d'algorithmes génétiques pour le calage de modèles conceptuels pluie-débit

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 357-379

  Franchini, Marco ^a   Galeati, Giorgio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b Divisione Produzione   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; RAIN; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELS (CRRM);

FLOOD CONTROL;

CALIBRATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; RAINFALL/RUNOFF MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031160838     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626669709492034     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Babovic, V., Wu, Z., and Larsen, L. C., 1994. “ Calibrating Hydrodynamic models by means of simulated evolution. ”. In Proc. First Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics, (Delft, The Netherlands) 193–200. Rotterdam.:Balkema.
2. Brazil, L. E., and Hudlow, M. D., 1981. “ Calibration procedure used with the National Weather Service River Foract System. ”. In Water and Related Land Resources Edited by:Haimes, Y. Y., and Kindler, J., 457–566. New York.:Pergamon.
3. Cieniawski, S. E., Eheart, J. W., and Ranjithan, S., 1995. Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiobjective monitoring program. Wat. Resour. Res., 31 (2):399–409.
4. Davis, L., 1991. Handbook of Genetic Algorithms. New York.:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
5. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Ibbitt, R. P., 1988. A Maximum likelihood criterion for use with data collected at unequal time intervals. Wat. Resour. Res., 24 (7):1163–1173.
6. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K., 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Wat. Resour. Res., 24 (7):1163–1173.
7. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K., 1993. A shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient optimization. J. Optimiz. Theory Appl., 76 (3):501–521.
8. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K., 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J. Hydrol., 158:265–284.
9. Esat, V., and Hall, M. J., 1994. “ Water Resources System Optimization using genetic algorithm. ”. In Proc. First Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics (Delft, The Netherlands) 225–231. Rotterdam.:Balkema.
10. Franchini, M., 1996. Using a genetic algorithm combined with a local search method for the automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. J., 41 (1):21–40.
11. Goldberg, D. E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning Reading, Massachusetts, USA:Addison Wesley.
12. Hendrickson, J. D., Sorooshian, S., and Brazil, L., 1988. Comparison of Newton type and direct search algorithms for calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Wat. Resour. Res., 24 (5):691–700.
13. Holland, J. H., 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA:University of Michigan Press.
14. Hooke, R., and Jeeves, T. A., 1961. Direct search solutions of numerical and statistical problems. J. Assoc. Comput. Mac., 8 (2):212–229.
15. Ibbitt, R. P., and O'Donnell, T., 1971. Fitting methods for conceptual catchment models. J. Hydrant. Engng, 97:1331–1342. (HY9)
16. Johnston, P. R., and Pilgrim, D., 1976. Parameter optimization for watershed models. Wat. Resour. Res., 12 (3):477–486.
17. Liong, S. Y., Chan, W. T., and ShreeRam, J., 1995. Peak flow forecasting with genetic algorithm and SWMM. J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE, 121 (8):613–617.
18. McKinney, D. C., and Lin, M. D., 1994. Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models. Wat. Resour. Res., 30 (6):1897–1906.
19. Michalewicz, Z., 1992. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures= Evolution Programs. Berlin.:Springer Verlag.
20. Muhlenbein, H., and Schlierkamp-Voosen, D., 1993. Predictive models for the Breeder genetic algorithm:1. Continuous parameter optimization. Evolutionary Computation MIT, 1 (1):25–49.
21. Rinvenuto, A., 1996. Potenzialità applicative dell'algoritmo genetico per la ricerca del minimo di funzioni a più variabili Italy.:Tesi di Laurea (University Thesis in Italian) University of Padova.
22. Ritzel, B. J., Eheart, J. W., and Ranjithan, S., 1994. Using genetic algorithm to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem. Wat. Resour. Res., 30 (5):1589–1603.
23. Rogers, L. L., and Dowla, F. U., 1994. Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modelling. Wat. Resour. Res., 30 (2):457–481.
24. Solomatine, D. P., 1995. “ The use of global random search for models calibration. ”. In IAHR Congress, London.
25. Sorooshian, S., Duan, Q., and Gupta, V. K., 1993. Calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using global optimization:application to the Sacramento Soil Moisture accounting model. Wat. Resour. Res., 29 (4):1185–1194.
26. Sugawara, M., Watanabe, I., Ozaki, E., and Katsuyame, Y., 1983. Reference Manual for the TANK Model. Tokyo.:National Research Center for Disaster Prevention.
27. Wang, Q. J., 1991. The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Wat. Resour. Res., 27 (9):2467–2471.
28. Wagner, B. J., 1995. Sampling design methods for groundwater modelling under uncertainty. Wat. Resour. Res., 31 (19):2581–2591.
29. Whitley, D., and Hanson, T., 1989. Optimizing Neural Networks using Faster More Accurate Genetic Search Edited by:Schaffer, H., Kaufmann, Morgan, and Mateo, S., California
30. Wright, A. D., 1991. “ Genetic algorithm for real parameter optimization. ”. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms Edited by:Rawlins, G. J., Kaufmann, Morgan, and Mateo, S., California
31. Wu, Z. Y., 1994. Automatic model calibration by simulating evolution. MS Thesis, IHE, Delft, The Netherlands