Socioeconomic aspects of peritoneal dialysis in North America: Role of non medical factors in the choice of dialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 19, Issue SUPPL. 2, 1999, Pages

  Venkataraman, Vijaya ^a   Nolph, Karl D ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice of dialysis; North America; Socioeconomics

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; MORBIDITY; NORTH AMERICA; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURVIVAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033376979     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686089901902s68     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. United States Renal Data System. Treatment modalities for ESRD patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(Suppl 1):S54-66.
2. Prichard SS. Treatment modality selection in 150 consecutive patients starting ESRD therapy. Perit Dial Int. 1996; 16:69-72.
3. Nissenson AR, Prichard SS, Cheng IKP, Gokal R, Kubota M, Maiorca R, et al. Non-medical factors that impact on ESRD modality selection. Kidney Int. 1993; 43(Suppl 40):S120-7.
4. Garella S. The costs of dialysis in the U.S.A. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997; 12(Suppl 1):10-21.
5. Bruns JF, Seddon P, Saul M, Zeidel ML. The cost of caring for end-stage kidney disease patients: An analysis based on hospital financial transaction records. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998; 9:884-90.
6. National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(Suppl 2):S70-3.
7. Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA. A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995; 6:177-83.
8. Wish JB. Comparative cost analysis of PD modalities in the "adequacy" era. Perit Dial Int. 1997; 17(Suppl 3): S38-9.
9. United States Renal Data System. Facility survey of providers of ESRD therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(Suppl 1):S178-86.
10. United States Renal Data System. The USRDS dialysis morbidity and mortality study: Wave 2. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(Suppl 1):S67-85.
11. Nolph KD. Why are reported relative mortality risks for CAPD and HD so variable? (Inadequacies of the Cox proportional hazards model.) Perit Dial Int. 1996; 16:15-18.
12. Vonesh E, Moran J. Further comparisons of mortality between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) [Abstract]. Perit Dial Int. 1998; 18(Suppl 1):S56.
13. Vonesh E, Moran J. Subgroup comparisons of mortality between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) [Abstract]. Perit Dial Int. 1998; 18(Suppl 1): S56.
14. United States Renal Data System. Incidence and prevalence of ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(Suppl 1): S40-53.
15. Fenton SS, Desmeules M, Copleston P, Arbus G, Froment D, Jeffery J, et al. Renal replacement therapy in Canada: A report from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995; 25:134-50.
16. Churchill DN, Taylor DW, Keshaviah PR, for the Canada-U.S.A. (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7:198-207.
17. D'Amico G. Comparability of the different registries on renal replacement therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995; 25:113-18.
18. Churchill DN, Thorpe KE, Vonesh EF, Keshaviah PR, for the Canada-U.S.A. (CANUSA) peritoneal dialysis study group. Lower probability of patient survival with continuous peritoneal dialysis in United States compared with Canada. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997; 8:965-71.
19. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, Morrison HI, Mao Y, Copleston P, et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30:334-42.