Induced traffic and induced demand

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1659, 1999, Pages 68-75

  Lee Jr , Douglass B ^a   Klein, Lisa A ^b   Camus, Gregorio ^c  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

^b Metropolitan Transportation   (United States)

^c Computer Sciences Corporation ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HIGHWAY PLANNING; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

INDUCED DEMAND; INDUCED TRAFFIC;

HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 0033351389     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1659-09     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Small. K. A. Urban Transportation Economics. Harwood Academic, Chur, United Kingdom, 1992.
2. Small, K. A., C. Winston, and C. A. Evans. Road Work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy. Brookings, Washington, D.C., 1989.
3. Camus. G., and H. Weinblatt. Highway Economic Requirements System: Technical Report, Version 3. Prepared for FHWA. U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe Center, Cambridge, Mass., March 1999.
4. Taplin, J. H. E. Interring Ordinary Elasticities from Choice or ModeSplit Elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1982.
5. Dargay, J. M., and P. B. Goodwin. Evaluation of Consumer Surplus with Dynamic Demand. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1995, pp. 179-193.
6. Mackie, P. Induced Traffic and Economic Appraisal. Transportation, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1996, pp. 103-119.
7. Williams, H. C. W. L., and Y. Yamashita. Travel Demand Forecasts and the Evaluation of Highway Schemes Under Congested Conditions. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1992, pp. 261-282.
8. Coombe, D. Induced Traffic: What Do Transportation Models Tell Us? Transportation, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1996, pp. 83-101.
9. DeCorla-Souza, P., and H. Cohen. Accounting for Induced Travel in Evaluation of Metropolitan Highway Expansion. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Jan. 1998.
10. Dowling, R. G. A Framework for Understanding the Demand-Inducing Effects of Highway Capacity. Dowling Associates, Oakland, Calif., Jan. 1994.
11. Heanue, K. Highway Capacity and Induced Travel: Issues, Evidence, and Implication. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Jan. 1997.
12. Holder, R. W., and V. G. Stover. An Evaluation of Induced Traffic on New Highway Facilities. Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex., March 1972.
13. Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment. Trunk Roads and the Generation of Traffic. Department of Transport, London, United Kingdom, Dec. 1994.
14. Cambridge Systematics and JHK Associates. NCHRP Report 8-19: The Relationship of Changes in Urban Highway Supply to Vehicle Miles of Travel. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., March 1979.
15. Effects of Increased Highway Capacity on Travel Behavior: Literature Review. Prepared for California Air Resources Board. Dowling Associates, Oakland, Calif., July 1993.
16. Dowling, R. G., and S. B. Colman. Effects of Increased Highway Capacity: Results of Household Travel Behavior Survey. In Transportation Research Record 1493, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 143-149.
17. Goodwin, P. B. Extra Traffic Induced by Road Construction. In Infrastructure-Induced Mobility, ECMT Round Table 105. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France, 1998.
18. Hansen, M. Do New Highways Generate Traffic? Access, No. 7, 1995, pp. 16-22.
19. Hansen, M., D. Gillen, A. Dobbins, Y. Huang, and M. Puvathingal. The Air Quality Impacts of Urban Highway Capacity Expansion: Traffic Generation and Land Use Change. Prepared for California Department of Transportation. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., April 1993.
20. Kroes, E., A. Daly, H. Gunn, and T. Van der Hoorn. The Opening of the Amsterdam Ring Road. Transportation, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1996, pp. 71-82.
21. Pells, S. R. User Response to New Road Capacity: A Review of Published Evidence, Working Paper 283. Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds, United Kingdom, Nov. 1989.
22. Cairns, S., C. Hass-Klau, and P. Goodwin. Traffic Impact of Highway Capacity Reductions: Assessment of the Evidence. Prepared for London Transport. Landor, London, United Kingdom, March 1998.
23. Brand, D., and J. L. Benham. Elasticity-Based Method for Forecasting Travel on Current Urban Transportation Alternatives. In Transportation Research Record, 895, TRB. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 32-37.
24. Cohen, H. S. Review of Empirical Studies of Induced Traffic. In Special Report 245: Expanding Metropolitan Highways: Implications for Air Quality and Energy Use, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C:, 1995. pp. 295-309.
25. Infrastructure-Induced Mobility: ECMT Round Table 105. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France, 1998.
26. Goodwin, P. B. Empirical Evidence on Induced Traffic. Transportation. Vol. 23, No. 1, 1996, pp. 35-54.
27. Goodwin, P. B. A Review of New Demand Elasticities with Special Reference to Short-and Long-Run Effects of Price Changes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1992, pp. 155-170.
28. Transportation and Environmental Research and Information Services. Induced Demand. Traffic Diversion v. Generation & Related Issues: Annotated Bibliography. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., Sept. 1996.