Real-time fieldbus communications using Profibus networks

IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1241-1251

  Tovar, Eduardo ^a,b,c   Vasques, Francisco ^a,b,c  

^a IEEE

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE ENGENHARIA DO PORTO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION); DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

FIELDBUSES; TIMED TOKEN (TT) PROTOCOLS;

DATA COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

EID: 0033339383     PISSN: 02780046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/41.808018     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. J.-D. Decotignie and P. Pleinevaux, A survey on industrial communication networks, Ann. Telecommun., vol. 48, nos. 9-10, pp. 435-448, 1993.
2. General Purpose Field Communication System, European Standard EN 50170, July 1996.
3. Controller Area Network (CAN) - An In-Vehicle Serial Communication Protocol, SAE J1583, 1992.
4. K. Tindell, H. Hansson, and A. Wellings, Analysing real-time communications: Controller area network (CAN), in Proc. IEEE Real-Time Systems Symp. (RTSS'94), San Juan, PR, Dec. 1994, pp. 259-263.
5. P. Pedro and A. Burns, Worst case response time analysis of hard real-time sporadic traffic in FIP networks, in Proc. 9th Euromicro Workshop Real-time Systems, Toledo, Spain, June 1997, pp. 3-10.
6. F. Vasques, Sur l'intégration de mécanismes d'ordonnancement et de communication dans la sous-couche MAC de réseaux locaux tempsréel, LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France, Tech. Rep. LAAS 96229, June 1996.
7. E. Tovar and F. Vasques, Guaranteeing real-time message deadlines in Profibus networks, in Proc. 10th Euromicro Workshop Real-Time Systems, Berlin, Germany, June 1998, pp. 79-86.
8. Setting target rotation time in Profibus based real-time distributed applications, in Proc. 15th IFAC Workshop on Distributed Computer Control Systems (DDCS'98), Como, Italy, Sept. 1998, pp. 1-6.
9. R.M. Grow, A timed token protocol for local area networks, in Proc. Electro'82, Token Access Protocols, May 1982, pp. 1-7.
10. G. Agrawal, B. Chen, W. Zhao, and S. Davari, Guaranteeing synchronous message deadline with the timed token medium access control protocol, IEEE Trans. Comput, vol. 43, pp. 327-339, Mar. 1994.
11. Q. Zheng and K.G. Shin, Synchronous bandwidth allocation in FDDI networks, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 6, pp. 1332-1338, Dec. 1995.
12. P. Montuschi, L. Ciminiera, and A Valenzano, Time characteristics of IEE802.4 token bus protocol, Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng., vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 81-87, Jan. 1992.
13. E. Tovar and F. Vasques, Cycle time properties of the Profibus timed-token protocol, Comput. Commun., vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1206-1216, Aug. 1999.
14. E. Lawler and C. Martel, Scheduling periodically occurring tasks on multiple processors, Inf. Process. Lett., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9-12, Feb. 1981.
15. C. Liu and J. Layland, Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in hard-real-time environment, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 46-61, Jan. 1973.