Geometrical characterizations of constant modulus receivers

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 2745-2756

  Gu, Ming ^a   Tong, Lang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE FILTERING; ALGORITHMS; COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMIZATION;

BLIND EQUALIZATION; CONSTANT MODULUS ALGORITHM; DECONVOLUTION; SHALVI-WEINSTEIN ALGORITHMS;

SIGNAL RECEIVERS;

EID: 0033312939     PISSN: 1053587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/78.790656     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. D. P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific, 1995
2. W. Chung and J. LeBlanc, The local minima of fractionally-spaced CMA blind equalizer cost function in the presence of channel noise, in Proc. 1CASSP Conf., Seatle, WA, May 1998, vol. VI, pp. 3345-3348
3. C. R. Johnson, Jr. et. al., Blind equalization using the constant modulus criterion: A review, Proc. IEEE, vol. 86, pp. 1927-1950, Oct. 1998
4. I. Fijalkow, A. Touzni, and J. R. Treichler, Fractionally-spaced equaliztion using CMA: Robustness to channel noise and lack of disparity, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 45, pp. 56-66, Jan. 1997
5. G. J. Foschini, Equalizing without altering or detecting data, Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 64, pp. 1885-1911, Oct. 1985
6. D. N. Godard, Self-recovering equalization and carrier tracking in twodimensional data communication systems, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COMM-28, pp. 1867-1875, Nov. 1980
7. M. Gu and L. Tong, Geometrical characterizations of constant modulus receivers, in Proc. 30th Conf. Inform. Sci. Syst., Princeton, NJ, Mar. 1998
8. M. Gu and L. Tong, Power-constrained constant modulus algorithm for CDMA, in Proc. 9th IEEE Signal Process. Workshop Stat. Array Signal Process., Portland, OR, Sept. 1998.
9. C. R. Johnson, Jr. and B. D. O. Anderson, Godard blind equalizer erro surface characteristics: White, zero-mean, binary source case, Int. J Adaptive Contr. Signal Process., pp. 301-324, 1995.
10. Y. Li and Z. Ding, Global convergence of fractionally spaced Godar (CMA) adaptive equalizers, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 44 pp. 818-826, Apr. 1996.
11. Y. Li, J. R. Liu, and Z. Ding, Length and cost dependent loca minima of unconstrained blind channel equalizers, IEEE Trans. Signa Processing, vol. 44, pp. 2726-2735, Nov. 1996.
12. D. Liu and L. Tong, An analysis of constant modulus algorithm fo array signal processing, Signal Process., vol. 73, pp. 81-104, Jan. 1999.
13. D. G. Luenberger, Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Reading, MA Addison-Wesley, 1984.
14. O. Shalvi and E. Weinstein, New criteria for blind deconvolution o nonminimum phase systems (channels), IEEE Inform. Theory, vol. 36 pp. 312-320, Mar. 1990.
15. L. Tong and S.Y. Kung, Independent component analysis in noise, i Proc. 32nd Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst., Comput., Asilomar, CA, Nov 1998.
16. J. R. Treichler and B. G. Agée, A new approach to multipath correctio of constant modulus signals, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signa Processing, vol. ASSP-31, pp. 459-472, Apr. 1983.
17. J. R. Treichler, I. Fijalkow, and C. R. Johnson, Jr., Fractionally space equalizers, IEEE Signal Processing Mag., pp. 45-81, May 1996.
18. J. R. Treichler, M. G. Larimore, and J. C. Harp, Transient an convergent behavior of the adaptive line enhancer, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-27, pp. 53-62, Feb. 1979.
19. S. Vembu, S. Verdu, and R. A. Kennedy, Convex cost functions in blin equalization, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 42, pp. 1952-1959 Aug. 1994.
20. H. Zeng, L. Tong, and C. R. Johnson, Relationships between CMA an Wiener receivers, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 44, pp. 1523-1538 July 1998.
21. S. Zeng, H. Zeng, and L. Tong, Blind equalization using CMA Performance analysis and a new algorithm, in Proc. 1996 IEEE Int Conf. Commun., Dallas, TX, June 1996, vol. 2, pp. 847-851.