Dynamics of serial multibody systems using the decoupled natural orthogonal complement matrices

Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions ASME

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 986-996

  Saha, S K ^a,b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EQUATIONS OF MOTION; MANIPULATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

DECOUPLED NATURAL ORTHOGONAL COMPLEMENT MATRICES; SERIAL MULTIBODY SYSTEMS;

MECHANISMS;

EID: 0033293544     PISSN: 00218936     EISSN: 15289036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2791809     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Angeles, J., 1997, Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Angeles, J., and Lee, S., 1988, “The Formulation of Dynamical Equations of Holonomic Mechanical Systems Using a Natural Orthogonal Complement,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 55, pp. 243-244.
3. Angeles, J., and Ma, O., 1988, “Dynamic Simulation of «-axis Serial Robotic Manipulators Using a Natural Orthogonal Complement,” Int. J. of Rob. Res., Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 32-47.
4. Angeles, J., Ma, O., and Rojas, A., 1989, “An Algorithm for the Inverse Dynamics of n-Axis General Manipulator Using Kane’s Formulation of Dynamical Equations,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 17, No. 12, pp. 1545-1561.
5. Armstrong, W. W., 1979, “Recursive Solution to the Equations of Motion of an n-Link Manipulator,” Proc. of the 5th World Cong, on Th. ofMach. and Mech., Vol. 2, Montreal, Canada, ASME, New York, pp. 1343-1346.
6. Ascher, U. M., Pai, D. K., and Cloutier, B. P., 1997, “Forward Dynamics, Elimination Methods, and Formulation Stiffness in Robot Simulation,” Int. J. of Rob. Res., Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 749-758.
7. Cyril, X., 1988, “Dynamics of Flexible-Link Manipulators,” Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Canada.
8. Denavit, J., and Hartenberg, R. S., 1955, “A Kinematic Notation for Lower-Pair Mechanisms Based on Matrices,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 77, pp.215-221.
9. Featherstone, R., 1983, “The Calculation of Robot Dynamics Using Articulated-Body Inertias,” Int. J. of Rob. Res., Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 13-30.
10. Fijany, A., Sharf, I., and D’Eleuterio, M. T. D., 1995, “Parallel 0(log N) Algorithms for Computation of Manipulator Forward Dynamics,” IEEE Trans, on R&A, Vol. 11, No. 3.
11. Hollerbach, J. M., 1980, “A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Manipulator Dynamics and a Comparative Study of Dynamics Formulation Complexity,” IEEE Trans, on Sys., Man, and Cybernatics, Vol. SMC-10, pp. 730-736.
12. Huston, H., and Passerello, C. E., 1974, “On Constraint Equations—A New Approach,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 41, pp. 1130-1131.
13. Jain, A., and Rodriguez, G., 1995, “Diagonalized Lagrangian Robot Dynamics,” IEEE Trans, on R&A, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 571-584.
14. Kamman, J. W., and Huston, R. L., 1984, “Dynamics of Constrained Multibody Systems,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 51, pp. 899-903.
15. Kane, T. R., and Levinson, D. A., 1983, “The Use of Kane’s Dynamical Equations for Robotics,” Int. J. of Rob. Res., Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 3-21.
16. Lilly, K. W., and Orin, D. E., 1990, “Efficient O(n) Computation of the Operational Space Inertia Matrix,” Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on R&A, Vol. 2, Cincinnati, OH, May 13-18, pp. 1014-1019.
17. Luh, J. Y. S., Walker, M. W., and Paul, R. P. C., 1980, “On-Line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 102, pp. 69-76
18. McMillan, S., and Orin, D. E., 1995, “Efficient Computation of Articulated-Body Inertias Using Successive Axial Screws,” IEEE Trans, on R&A, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 606-611.
19. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vellerling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1997, Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, New Delhi.
20. Rodriguez, G., 1987, “Kalman Filtering, Smoothing, and Recursive Robot Arm Forward and Inverse Dynamics,” IEEE Trans, on R&A, Vol. RA-3, No. 6, pp. 624-639
21. Rodriguez, G., Jain, A., and Kreutz-Delgado, K., 1991, “A Spatial Operator Algebra for Manipulation Modeling and Control,” Int. J. of Rob. Res., Vol. 10, No.4, pp. 371-381.
22. Rodriguez, G., and Kreutz-Delgado, K., 1992, “Spatial Operator Factorization and Inversion of the Manipulator Mass Matrix,” IEEE Trans, on R&A, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 65-76.
23. Saha, S. K., and Angeles, J., 1991, “Dynamics of Nonholonomic Mechanical Systems Using a Natural Orthogonal Complement,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 58, pp. 238-243.
24. Saha, S. K., 1997, “A Decomposition of the Manipulator Inertia Matrix,” IEEE Trans, on R&A, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 301-304.
25. Schiehlen, W., 1991, “Computational Aspects in Multibody System Dynamics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 90, No. 1-3, pp. 569-582.
26. Sciavicco, L., and Siciliano, B., 1996, Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators, McGraw-Hill, New York.
27. Stewart, G. E., 1973, Introduction to Matrix Computations, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
28. Walker, M. W., and Orin, D. E., 1982, “Efficient Dynamic Computer Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 104, pp. 205-211.
29. Wehage, R. A., and Haug, E. J., 1982, “Generalized Coordinate Partitioning for Dimension Reduction in Analysis of Constrained Dynamic Systems,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 104, pp. 247-255.