Forward dynamics, elimination methods, and formulation stiffness in robot simulation

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 749-758

  Ascher, Uri M ^a   Pai, Dinesh K ^a   Cloutier, Benoit P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; ERROR CORRECTION; MANIPULATORS; STIFFNESS MATRIX;

ROBOT SIMULATION;

ROBOTS;

EID: 0031333525     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/027836499701600603     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Angeles, J., and Ma, O. 1988. Dynamic simulation of n-axis serial robotic manipulators using a natural orthogonal complement. Int. J. Robot. Res. 7(5):32-47.
2. Armstrong, W. W. 1979. Recursive solution to the equations of motion of an n-link manipulator. In Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, vol. 2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 1343-1346.
3. Ascher, U., and Lin, P. 1997. Sequential regularization methods for nonlinear higher index DAE's. SIAM J. Scient. Comput. 18(1):160-181.
4. Bae, D. S., and Haug, E. J. 1987. A recursive formulation for constrained mechanical system dynamics: part I, open loop systems. Mech. Structures Machines 15(3):359-382.
5. Bock, G., and von Schwerin, R. 1993. An inverse dynamics Adams method for constrained multibody systems. Technical Report 93-27. University of Heidelberg, IWR.
6. Brandi, H., Johanni, R., and Otter, M. 1986 (December). A very efficient algorithm for the simulation of robots and similar multibody systems without inversion of the mass matrix. In Proceedings of the IFAC/IFIP/IMACS International Symposium on the Theory of Robots. International Federation of Automatic Control.
7. Cloutier, B., Pai, D. K., and Ascher, U. M. 1995. The formulation stiffness of forward dynamics algorithms and implications for robot simulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 2816-2822.
8. Ellis, R. E., Ismaeil, O. M., and Carmichael, I. H. 1992. Numerical stability of forward-dynamics algorithms. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, pp. 305-311.
9. Ellis, R. E. and Ricker, S. L. 1994. Two numerical issues in simulating constrained robot dynamics. In IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybernet. 24(1):19-27.
10. Featherstone, R. 1983. The calculation of robot dynamics using articulated-body inertias. Int J. Robot. Res. 2(1):13-30.
11. Featherstone, R. 1987. Robot Dynamics Algorithms. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
12. Jain, A. 1991. Unified formulation of dynamics for serial rigid multibody systems. J. Guidance Control Dynamics 14(3):531-542.
13. Lubich, C., Nowak, U., Pohle, U., and Engstler, C. 1992. MEXX - Numerical software for the integration of constrained mechanical multibody systems. Technical Report SC92-12, Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik, Berlin.
14. Rodriguez, G. 1987. Kalman filtering, smoothing, and recursive robot arm forward and inverse dynamics. IEEE J. Robot. Automat. 3(6):624-639.
15. Rodriguez, G., Jain, A., and Kreutz-Delgado, K. 1991. A spatial operator algebra for manipulator modeling and control. Int J. Robot. Res. 10(4):371-381.
16. Vereshchagin, A. F. 1974. Computer simulation of the dynamics of complicated mechanisms of robot-manipulators. Eng. Cybernet. 6:65-70.
17. Walker, M. W., and Orin, D. E. 1982. Efficient dynamic computer simulation of robotic mechanisms. J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 104:205-211.