Evolution in democracy-war dynamics

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 771-792

  Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin ^a   Gates, Scott ^a   Hegre, Håvard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033264444     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002799043006005     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Babst, Dean V. 1964. Elected governments: A force for peace. The Wisconsin Sociologist 3:9-14.
2. Beck, Nathaniel. 1983. Time-varying parameter regression models. American Journal of Political Science 27:557-600.
3. _. 1989. Estimating dynamic models using Kalman filtering. Political Analysis 1:121-56.
4. Beck, Nathaniel, and Simon Jackman. 1998. Beyond linearity by default: Generalized additive models. American Journal of Political Science 42:596-627.
5. Benoit, Kenneth. 1996. Democracies really are more pacific (in general): Reexamining regime type and war involvement. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40:636-57.
6. Bohara, Alok K., and Christine Sauer. 1992. Competing macro-hypotheses in the United States: A Kalman filtering approach. Applied Economics 24:389-99.
7. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Renee M. Smith. 1998. Investigating political dynamics using fractional integration methods. American Journal of Political Science 42:661-89.
8. Bremer, Stuart A. 1992. Dangerous dyads. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36:309-41.
9. _. 1993. Democracy and militarized interstate conflict, 1816-1965. International Interactions 18:231-49.
10. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1992. War and reason: Domestic and international imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1998. Peace through war? Evolutionary consequences of democratic war behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April, Chicago.
12. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller. 1992. War and the fate of regimes: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review 86:638-46.
13. Bull, Hedley. 1977. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1998. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the democratic peace as a collective learning process. Unpublished manuscript, Political Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles.
15. Chan, Steve. 1984. Mirror, mirror on the wall. . . . Are the freer countries more pacific? Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:617-48.
16. Davidson, Russell, and James G. MacKinnon. 1993. Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. DeBoef, Suzanna, and Jim Granato. 1997. Near-integrated data and the analysis of political relationships. American Journal of Political Science 41:619-40.
18. Dixon, William J. 1993. Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37:42-68.
19. _. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review 88:14-32.
20. Doyle, Michael. 1983a. Kant, liberal legacies and foreign affairs (part I). Philosophy and Public Affairs 12:205-35.
21. _. 1983b. Kant, liberal legacies and foreign affairs (part II). Philosophy and Public Affairs 12:323-53.
22. _. 1986. Liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review 80:1151-70.
23. Farber, H. S., and Joanne Gowa. 1997. Common interests or common polities? Reinterpreting the democratic peace. Journal of Politics 59:393-417.
24. Gates, Scott, Torbjorn Knutsen, and Jonathon Moses. 1996. Democracy and peace: A more skeptical view. Journal of Peace Research 33:1-10.
25. Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and Håvard Hegre. 1997. Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:283-310.
26. Harvey, Andrew C. 1989. Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman filter. London: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hinsley, Francis H. 1963. Power and the pursuit of peace: Theory and practice in the history of relations between states. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Huntley, Wade L. 1996. Kant's third image: Systemic sources of the liberal peace. International Studies Quarterly 40:45-76.
29. Jaggers, Keith, and Ted R. Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32:469-82.
30. James, Patrick, Eric Solberg, and Murray Wolfson. 1999. An identified systemic model of the democracy-peace nexus. Defence and Peace Economics 10:1-37.
31. Kalman, Rudolf E. 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions ASME, Series D 82:34-45.
32. Kant, Immanuel. [1784] 1991. Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose. In Kant political writings, edited by Hans Reiss, 41-53. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. _. [1795] 1991. Perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In Kant political writings, edited by Hans Reiss, 93-130. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. _. [1797] 1991.The metaphysics of morals. In Kant political writings, edited by Hans Reiss, 131-75. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. _. [1798] 1991. The contest of faculties. In Kant political writings, edited by Hans Reiss, 176-90. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lake, David A. 1992. Powerful pacifists: Democratic states and war. American Political Science Review 86:24-37.
37. Maoz, Zeev, and Nasrin Abdolali. 1989. Regime types and international conflict, 1816-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution 33:3-35.
38. Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett. 1992. Alliance, contiguity, wealth, and political stability: Is the lack of conflict among democracies a statistical artifact? International Interactions 17:245-67.
39. _. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace. American Political Science Review 87:624-38.
40. McLaughlin, Sara. 1997. The systemic democratic peace. Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University.
41. McLaughlin, Sara, and Scott Gates. 1998. Dynamic relationships in international relations: A Kalman filter analysis of the systemic relationship between democracy and war. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, March, Minneapolis.
42. Morgan, T. Clifton, and Valerie L. Schwebach. 1992. Take two democracies and call me in the morning. International Interactions 17:305-20.
43. Mousseau, Michael. 1997. Democracy and militarized interstate collaboration. Journal of Peace Research 34:73-87.
44. Oneal, John R., Frances H. Oneal, Zeev Maoz, and Bruce M. Russett. 1996. The liberal peace: Interdependence, democracy, and international conflict, 1950-1985. Journal of Peace Research 33:11-28.
45. Oneal, John R., and Bruce M. Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 41:267-94.
46. _. 1999. The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. World Politics 52.
47. _. 2000. Why "An identified systemic model of the democracy-peace nexus" does not persuade. Defence and Peace Economics 11.
48. Raknerud, Arvid, and Havard Hegre. 1997. The hazard of war: Reassessing the evidence of the democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research 34:385-404.
49. Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracy and international conflict: An evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
50. Raymond, Gregory A. 1994. Democracies, disputes, and third-party intermediaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38:24-42.
51. _. 1996. Demosthenes and democracies: Regime type and arbitration outcomes. International Interactions 22:1-20.
52. Reiss, Hans S., ed. 1991. Kant's political writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam III. 1998. Democracy and battlefield military effectiveness. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:259-77.
54. Rousseau, David L., Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter, and Paul K. Huth. 1996. Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1918-88. American Political Science Review 90:512-33.
55. Rummel, R. J. 1983. Libertarianism and international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 27:27-71.
56. _. 1995. Democracies are less warlike than other regimes. European Journal of International Relations 1:457-79.
57. Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-cold war world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. Singer, J. David, Stuart A. Bremer, and John Stuckey. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In Peace, war, and numbers, edited by Bruce M. Russett, 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
59. Singer, Max, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1993. The real world order: Zones of peace/zones of turmoil. Chatham: Chatham House.
60. Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer. 1976. The war-proneness of democratic regimes, 1816-1975. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1:50-69.
61. _. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
62. Smith, Renee M. 1993. Error correction, attractors, and cointegration: Substantive and methodological issues. Political Analysis 4:249-54.
63. Stam, Allan C. III. 1996. Win, lose, or draw: Domestic politics and the crucible of war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
64. Starr, Harvey. 1992. Why don't democracies fight one another - Evaluating the theory-findings feedback loop. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 14:41-59.
65. Thompson, William R. 1996. Democracy and peace: Putting the cart before the horse? International Organization 50:141-74.
66. Weede, Erich. 1984. Democracy and war involvement. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:649-64.
67. _. 1992. Some simple calculations on democracy and war involvement. Journal of Peace Research 29:377-83.
68. Werner, Suzanne. 1996. Absolute and limited war: The possibility of foreign-imposed regime change. International Interactions 22:67-88.
69. Williams, John. 1993. What comes around goes around: Unit root tests and cointegration. Political Analysis 4:229-36.