Mechanism of CDW-SDW Transition in One Dimension

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 68, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 3123-3126

  Nakamura, Masaaki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bond order wave; Charge gap; Charge density wave; Gaussian transition; Renormalization group; Spin gap; Spin density wave; Tomonaga Luttinger liquid; Tricritical point

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033260098     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.68.3123     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. R. A. Bari: Phys. Rev. B 3 (1971) 2622.
2. J. E. Hirsch: Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 2327.
3. P. G. J. van Dongen: Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 7904.
4. V. J. Emery: in Highly Conducting One-Dimensional Solids, ed. J. T. Devreese, R. Evrand and V. van Doren (Plenum, New York, 1979) p. 327.
5. J. Sólyom: Adv. Phys. 28 (1979) 201.
6. J. Voit: Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 4027.
7. B. Fourcade and G. Spronken: Phys. Rev. B 29 (1984) 5089: ibid. 5096.
8. B. Fourcade and G. Spronken: Phys. Rev. B 29 (1984) 5089: ibid. 5096.
9. J. W. Cannon and E. Fradkin: Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 9435.
10. J. W. Cannon, R. T. Scalatter and E. Fradkin: Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991) 5995.
11. G. P. Zhang: Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 9189.
12. R. Julien and F. D. M. Haldane: Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 28 (1983) 344.
13. K. Okamoto and K. Nomura: Phys. Lett. A 169 (1992) 433.
14. K. Nomura and K. Okamoto: J. Phys. A 27 (1994) 5773.
15. M. Nakamura, K. Nomura and A. Kitazawa: Phys Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3214.
16. M. Nakamura: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67 (1998) 717.
17. M. Nakamura, A. Kitazawa and K. Nomura: Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 7850.
18. For recent review, see J. Voit: Rep. Prog. Phys. 57 (1995) 977.
19. ρ3.
20. E. B. Kolomeisky and J. P. Straley: Rev. Mod Phys. 68 (1996) 175.
21. For the derivation of these operators, see ref. 6.
22. In ref. 10, the critical point is determined by observing the CDW and the SDW structure factor using the density-matrix-renormalization-group method. This result agrees with our level-crossing point of the CDW and the SDW excitations.
23. In ref. 3, an approximation is used to solve the equation for the CDW-SDW phase boundary. However, this treatment is not appropriate, because the contribution from the neglected part is large. In the approximated case, the region where the CDW-SDW transition agrees with the Gaussian line is overestimated up to U/l ∼ 6.
24. D. K. Campbell, J. Tinka Gammel and E. Y. Loh, Jr.: Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 475.
25. G. I. Japaridze and A. P. Kampf: Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 12822.