Meta-analysis of studies assessing the efficacy of projective techniques in discriminating child sexual abuse

Child Abuse and Neglect

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1151-1166

  West, Maxine M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Child sexual abuse; Effect size; Projective instrument

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD ABUSE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOANALYSIS; SEXUAL ABUSE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE, SEXUAL; HUMANS; PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0031767974     PISSN: 01452134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00086-6     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. *Allan, J., & Crandall, J. (1986). The rosebush: A visualization strategy. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 21, 44-51.
2. Aron B. A manual for analysis of the Thematic Apperception Test A method and technique for personality research . 1949;Willis E. Berg, Berkeley, CA.
3. *Blaine, G. H., Bergner, R. M., Lewis, M. L., & Goldstein, M. A. (1981). The use of the objectively scorable House-Tree-Person indicators to establish child abuse. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 667-673.
4. Brakewell G.M., Hammond S., Fife-Shaw C. Research methods in psychology. 1995;Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
5. Buck, J. N., & Jolles, I. (1946). H-T-P. Western Psychological Services.
6. Burns R.C., Kaufman S.H. Actions, styles, and symbols in Kinetic Family Drawings (KFD). 1972;Brunner/Mazel, New York.
7. *Chantler, L., Pelco, L., & Mertin, P. (1993). The psychological evaluation of child sexual abuse using the Louisville Behavior Checklist and Human Figure Drawing. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17, 271-279.
8. Cohen H., Weil G. Tasks of Emotional Development Test. 1971;Heath, MA, Washington, DC.
9. Cohen J.E. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. 1988;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Elkisch P. Free art expression. Rabin A.I., Haworth M.R. Projective techniques with children. 1960;273-288 Grune & Stratton, New York.
11. Exner J.E. The Rorschach. 1978;Wiley, New York.
12. Exner, J. E. (1986). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (2nd ed., vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
13. Exner J.E. The Rorschach A comprehensive system . 3rd ed. 1990;Wiley, New York.
14. Exner, J. E. (1991). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (2nd ed., vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
15. Fine R. Manual for a scoring scheme for verbal projective techniques (TAT, MAPS, stories, and the like). Journal of Projective Techniques. 19:1955;306-309.
16. Glass G.V. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Research. 5:1976;3-8.
17. Goodenough F.L., Harris D.B. Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test. 1963;Harcourt, Brace, & Javanovich, Inc.
18. *Hackbarth, S. G., Murphy, H. D., & McQuary, J. P. (1991). Identifying sexually abused children by using Kinetic Family Drawings. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 25, 255-266.
19. *Henderson, O. (1990). The object relations of sexually abused girls. Melanie Klein and Object Relations, 8, 63-76.
20. *Hibbard, R. A., & Hartman, G. L. (1990). Emotional indicators in human figure drawings of sexually victimized and nonabused children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 211-219.
21. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology. 3rd ed. 1992;Kent Publishing Co, Boston, MA.
22. Hunter J.E., Schmidt F.L. Methods of meta-analysis Correcting error and bias in research findings . 1990;Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
23. Kendall-Tackett K., Williams L., Finkelhor D. Impact of sexual abuse on children A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies . Psychological Bulletin. 113:1993;164-180.
24. *Kinard, E. M. (1980). Emotional development in physically abused children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 686-696.
25. Koppitz E.M. Emotional indicators on human figure drawings of children A validation study . Journal of Clinical Psychology. 22:1966;313-315.
26. Koppitz E.M. Psychological evaluation of children's Human Figure Drawings. 1968;Grune & Statton, New York.
27. *Leifer, M., Shapiro, J. P., Martone, M. W., & Kassem, L. (1991). Rorschach assessment of psychological functioning in sexually abused girls. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 14-28.
28. *Manning, T. M. (1987). Aggression depicted in abused children's drawings. Arts in Psychotherapy, 14, 15-24.
29. Miller L.C. Louisville Behavior Checklist. 1984;Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA. rev.
30. Murray H.A. Thematic Apperception Test manual. 1943;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. *Nash, M. R., Zivney, O. A., & Hulsey, T. (1993). Characteristics of sexual abuse associated with greater psychological impairment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 797-805.
32. Nezworski M.T., Wood J.M. Narcissism in the comprehensive system for the Rorschach. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2:1995;179-199.
33. *Ornduff, S. R., Freedenfeld, R. N., Kelsey, R. M., & Critelli, J. W. (1994). Object relations of sexually abused female subjects: A TAT analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 223-238.
34. Orwin R.G. A fail-safe N for effect size. Journal of Educational Statistics. 8:1983;157-159.
35. Piers E., Harris D. The Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale. 1969;Counselor Recordings and Tests, Nashville, TN.
36. *Pistole, D. R., & Ornduff, S. R. (1994). TAT assessment of sexually abused girls: An analysis of manifest content. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 211-222.
37. *Rasch, M. A., & Wagner, E. E. (1989). Initial psychological effects of sexual abuse on female children as reflected in the Hand Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 761-769.
38. *Reidy, T. J. (1977). The aggressive characteristics of abused and neglected children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 1140-1145.
39. Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik (Trans. Haus Huber Verlag, 1942). Bern: Haus Huber. Distributed by Western Psychological Services. Albuquerque, NM: The American Institute for Psychological Research.
40. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for the social research. 1987;Sage, Newbury Park, CA. rev.
41. Rosenthal R., Rosnow R.L. Essentials of behavioral research Methods and data analysis . 2nd ed. 1991;McGraw Hill, St. Louis, MO.
42. Rosenzweig S. Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study. 1948;Author, St. Louis, MO. Formforchildren.
43. *Stovall, G., & Craig, R. J. (1990). Mental representations of physically and sexually abused latency-aged females. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 233-242.
44. Taylor, B., & Franzen, S. (1986). The internalized object relations scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
45. Terr L.C. Childhood traumas An outline and overview . American Journal of Psychiatry. 148:1991;10-20.
46. Wagner E.E. Hand Test Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation . 1962;Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA.
47. Wagner E.E. The Hand Test manual. 1983;Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA. rev.
48. Westen D., Lohr N., Silk K., Kerber K., Goodrich S. Object relations and social cognition TAT scoring manual. 1985;University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
49. Wolfe F.M. Meta-analysis Quantitative methods for research studies . 1986;Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
50. Wolfe V.V., Birt J. The psychological sequelae of child sexual abuse. Ollendick T.H., Prinz R.J. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, (vol. 17). 1995;233-263 Plenum Press, New York.
51. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., & Stejskal, W. J. (in press). Exner's comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science.
52. Zimmerman D.P., Dillard J. The Rorschach assessment of sexually abused children in residential treatment A research note . Residential Treatment for Children and Youth. 12:1994;59-72.
53. *Zivney, O. A., Nash, M. R., & Hulsey, T. L. (1988). Sexual abuse in early versus late childhood: Differing patterns of pathology as revealed on the Rorschach. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25, 99-106.