A Mixed-Motive Perspective on the Economics Versus Environment Debate

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1254-1276

  Hoffman, Andrew J ^a   Gillespie, James Judson ^b   Moore, Don A ^b   Wade Benzoni, Kimberly A ^c   Thompson, Leigh L ^b   Bazerman, Max H ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033244294     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764299042008002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baden, J. (1995, October 25). The adverse consequences of the ESA. The Seattle Times, p. B5.
2. Bazerman, M. H. (1998). Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: John Wiley.
3. Bazerman, M. H., Mannix, E., & Thompson, L. (1988). Groups as mixed-motive negotiations. In E. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 5). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4. Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. (1992). Negotiating rationally. New York: Free Press.
5. Bazerman, M. H., Russ, L., & Yakura, E. (1987). Post-settlement settlements in dyadic negotiations: The need for renegotiation in complex environments. Negotiation Journal, 3, 283-297.
6. Beatley, T. (1994). Habitat conservation planning: Endangered species and urban growth. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7. Campbell, D. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409-429.
8. Cohen, H. (1980). You can negotiate anything. Sesaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart.
9. Druckman, D. (1968). Prenegotiation experience and dyadic conflict resolution in a bargaining situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(4), 367-383.
10. Ember, L. (1991, July). Strategies for reducing pollution at the source are gaining ground. Chemical and Engineering News, 7-16.
11. Engineering News Record. (1991, August 5). DuPont to spend big to cut plant pollution, p. 22.
12. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. New York: Penguin.
13. Gillespie, J., & Bazerman, M. (1998). Pre-settlement settlement (PreSS): A simple technique for initiating complex negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 14(2), 149-159.
14. Gore, A. (1992). Earth in the balance. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
15. Green Business Letter. (1997). Sleeping with the enemy: What business and activist groups really think about working together. Washington, DC: Tilden.
16. Hampton, B. (1997). The great American wolf. New York: Henry Holt.
17. Hoffman, A. (1997). From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. San Francisco: New Lexington.
18. Hoffman, A., Bazerman, M. H., & Yaffee, S. (1997). Balancing business interests and endangered species protection. Sloan Management Review, 39(1), 59-73.
19. Karrass, C. (1970). The negotiating game: How to get what you want. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
20. Lax, D., & Sebenius, J. (1986). The manager as negotiator. New York: Free Press.
21. McSorley, M. (1993, March 22). EPA, company happy with Freon gone. Manchester Union Leader, p. 4.
22. Murnighan, K. (1991). The dynamics of bargaining games. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Neale, M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: Free Press.
24. Palmer, K., Oates, W., & Portney, P. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132.
25. Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995a, September/October). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 120-134.
26. Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995b). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
27. Portney, P. (1998). The role of research and development in setting collaborative climate change goals. In A. Hoffman (Ed.), Global Climate Change (pp. 168-170). San Francisco: New Lexington.
28. Pruitt, D. (1983). Interactive agreements: Nature and antecedents. In M. H. Bazerman & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 35-50). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. (1985). Social conflict: Escalation, impasse, and resolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
31. Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Raiffa, H. (1985). Post-settlement settlements. Negotiation Journal, 1(1), 9-12.
33. Ross, L. (1995). Reactive devaluation in negotiation and conflict resolution. In K. Arrow, R. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky, & R. Wilson (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution. New York: W. W. Norton.
34. Saunders, H. (1985). We need a larger theory of negotiation: The importance of pre-negotiating phases. Negotiation Journal, 1(3), 249-262.
35. Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund. (1995). The Endangered Species Act works—success stories. Washington, DC: Author.
36. Solomon, C. (1993, March 29). Clearing the air: What really pollutes? Wall Street Journal, p. 1.
37. Stegemeier, R. (1995). Straight talk: The future of energy in the global economy. Los Angeles: Unocal.
38. Thompson, L., & Gonzalez, R. (1997). Environmental disputes: Competition for scarce resources and clashing of values. In M. H. Bazerman, D. Messick, A. Tenbrunsel, & K. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management. San Francisco: New Lexington.
39. Tietenberg, T. (1992). Environmental and natural resource economics. New York: Harper Collins.
40. Tyler, T., & Lind, A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances In Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
41. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1995). Facts about The Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
42. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1994). Endangered species act: Information on species protection on nonfederal lands. Washington, DC: Author.
43. Wade-Benzoni, K., Tenbrunsel, A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Egocentric interpretations of fairness of asymmetric, environmental social dilemmas: Explaining harvesting behavior and the role of communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(2), 111-126.
44. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994, May/June). It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 46-51.
45. Walton, R., & McKersie, R. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.